Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Oregon Education Association

1997 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
OR U.S. House 5 Kurt Schrader Democratic 82%
OR Governor Kate Brown Democratic 100%
OR State Senate 1 Jeff Kruse Republican 40%
OR State Senate 4 Floyd Prozanski, Jr. Democratic 91%
OR State Senate 6 Lee Beyer Democratic 91%
OR State Senate 11 Peter Courtney Democratic 89%
OR State Senate 18 Ginny Burdick Democratic 100%
OR State Senate 19 Richard Devlin Democratic 91%
OR State Senate 30 Ted Ferrioli Republican 30%
Brady Adams 29%
Ron Adams 55%
Ken Baker 22%
Chris Beck 91%
Roger Beyer 36%
Jo Ann Bowman 91%
Tom Brian 14%
Neil Bryant 25%
Chuck Carpenter 82%
Margaret Carter 70%
Susan Castillo 100%
Tony Corcoran 91%
Ryan Deckert 82%
Gene Derfler 22%
Joan Dukes 80%
Verne Duncan 78%
Bill Dwyer 71%
Randall Edwards 90%
George Eighmey 100%
Mike Fahey 91%
Bill Fisher 20%
Dan Gardner 100%
Gary George 11%
Avel Louise Gordly 70%
Jeannette Hamby 44%
Lenn Hannon 70%
Steven Harper 36%
Thomas Hartung 22%
Jim Hill 40%
Bob Jenson 90%
Eldon Johnson 36%
Bryan Johnston 70%
D.E. Jones 20%
Timothy Josi 89%
Bob Kintigh 11%
Mike Lehman 91%
Randy Leonard 88%
Leslie Lewis 36%
John Lim 70%
Jane Lokan 40%
Dennis Luke 27%
Lynn Lundquist 40%
Bill Markham 30%
Kenneth Messerle 36%
Randy Miller 56%
Patricia Milne 10%
John Minnis 33%
Bob Montgomery 40%
David Nelson 50%
Carolyn Oakley 36%
Catherine Piercy 91%
Eileen Qutub 11%
Anitra Kitts Rasmussen 82%
Bob Repine 44%
Lonnie Roberts 80%
Barbara Ross 91%
Marylin Linfoot Shannon 11%
Lane Shetterly 73%
Frank Shields 90%
Mark Simmons 27%
Lynn Snodgrass 27%
Larry Sowa 82%
Charles Starr 27%
Ken Strobeck 45%
Shirley Stull 20%
Ron Sunseri 45%
Veral Tarno 22%
Jacqueline Taylor 100%
Terry Thompson 100%
Eugene Timms 22%
Clifford Trow 90%
Judith Uherbelau 91%
Liz VanLeeuwen 18%
John Watt 36%
Larry Wells 73%
Jim Welsh 36%
Bernard Westlund II 20%
Tom Whelan 100%
Thomas Andrew Wilde 75%
Cynthia Wooten 90%
Mae Yih 22%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top