Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Center for Security Policy

2011-2012 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 27%
Sandy Adams 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 13%
Todd Akin 100%
Rodney Alexander 100%
Jason Altmire 68%
Rob Andrews 18%
Steve Austria 100%
Kelly Ayotte 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 27%
Michele Bachmann 100%
Spencer Bachus 100%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 100%
Ron Barber 40%
John Barrow 86%
Roscoe Bartlett 77%
Charlie Bass 95%
Max Baucus 0%
Mark Begich 17%
Dan Benishek 95%
Rick Berg 100%
Shelley Berkley 45%
Howard Berman 23%
Judy Biggert 94%
Brian Bilbray 95%
Jeff Bingaman 0%
Tim Bishop 25%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 100%
Mary Bono Mack 100%
Dan Boren 74%
Leonard Boswell 14%
Charles Boustany, Jr. 100%
Barbara Boxer 0%
Bruce Braley 0%
Paul Broun 90%
Corrine Brown 21%
Scott Brown 63%
Ann Marie Buerkle 100%
Dan Burton 100%
Dave Camp 100%
John Campbell III 64%
Francisco Canseco 100%
Eric Cantor 100%
Lois Capps 5%
Dennis Cardoza 40%
Jean Carnahan 23%
Russ Carnahan 23%
Jason Chaffetz 95%
Saxby Chambliss 100%
Ben Chandler III 73%
Hansen Clarke 0%
Dan Coats 100%
Howard Coble 91%
Thomas Coburn 100%
Kent Conrad 25%
Jerry Costello 15%
Chip Cravaack 100%
Ander Crenshaw 100%
Mark Critz 41%
Geoff Davis 100%
James DeMint 88%
Norm Dicks 32%
John Dingell 15%
Bob Dold 86%
David Dreier 100%
Donna Edwards 0%
Renee Ellmers 100%
Jo Ann Emerson 95%
Sam Farr 5%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 10%
Bob Filner 0%
Stephen Fincher 100%
Mike Fitzpatrick 91%
John Fleming, Jr. 100%
Randy Forbes 100%
Barney Frank 0%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Scott Garrett 95%
Jim Gerlach 100%
Chris Gibson 41%
Phil Gingrey 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 32%
Michael Grimm 100%
Frank Guinta 100%
Kay Hagan 25%
Janice Hahn 8%
Ralph Hall 100%
Richard Hanna 91%
Tom Harkin 0%
Jane Harman 100%
Doc Hastings 100%
Nan Hayworth 95%
Joe Heck, Jr. 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Maurice Hinchey 0%
Rubén Hinojosa, Sr. 14%
Thomas Holden 41%
Rush Holt, Jr. 0%
Mike Honda 0%
Tim Huelskamp 91%
Robert Hurt 100%
Daniel Inouye 38%
Steve Israel 23%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 0%
Mike Johanns 100%
Tim Johnson 55%
Timothy Johnson 13%
John Kerry 13%
Jack Kingston 91%
Mark Kirk 33%
Larry Kissell 82%
John Kline 100%
Herb Kohl 25%
Dennis Kucinich 0%
Jon Kyl 100%
Mary Landrieu 38%
Tom Latham 100%
Steve LaTourette 90%
Frank Lautenberg 0%
Carl Levin 38%
Jerry Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Dick Lugar 75%
Cynthia Lummis 100%
Dan Lungren 100%
Connie Mack IV 95%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Matheson 62%
Carolyn McCarthy 50%
Thaddeus McCotter 100%
Jim McDermott 0%
Mike McIntyre 77%
Buck McKeon 100%
John Mica 100%
Mike Michaud 5%
Barbara Mikulski 13%
Candice Miller 100%
Gary Miller 100%
George Miller 5%
Jeff Miller 95%
Brad Miller 27%
Jim Moran, Jr. 5%
Sue Myrick 100%
Ben Nelson 38%
Randy Neugebauer 100%
Rich Nugent 100%
Alan Nunnelee 100%
John Olver 0%
Bill Owens 41%
Ed Pastor 18%
Ron Paul 5%
Donald Payne 0%
Tom Petri 64%
Joe Pitts 100%
Todd Platts 100%
Mike Pompeo 100%
Mark Pryor 50%
Ben Quayle 100%
Nick Rahall II 23%
Charlie Rangel 5%
Denny Rehberg 91%
Harry Reid 13%
Silvestre Reyes 26%
Reid Ribble 86%
Laura Richardson 23%
Scott Rigell 100%
David Rivera 100%
Jay Rockefeller IV 0%
Mike Rogers 100%
Mike Ross 81%
Steve Rothman 23%
Jon Runyan 100%
Loretta Sanchez 31%
Bobby Schilling 95%
Jean Schmidt 100%
Aaron Schock 95%
Allyson Schwartz 23%
Heath Shuler 68%
E.G. Shuster 100%
Olympia Snowe 63%
Steve Southerland 100%
Pete Stark 0%
Cliff Stearns 100%
Marlin Stutzman 100%
John Sullivan 100%
Betty Sutton 14%
Lee Terry 100%
John Tierney 0%
Ed Towns 0%
Bob Turner 100%
Mark Udall 0%
David Vitter 100%
Joe Walsh 95%
Mel Watt 9%
Henry Waxman 0%
Jim Webb, Jr. 14%
Anthony Weiner 0%
Allen West 100%
Lynn Westmoreland 100%
Ed Whitfield 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top