Rating Group: Florida League of Conservation Voters

2001 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
FL U.S. Senate-Jr Marco Rubio R 4%
FL U.S. House-5 Al Lawson, Jr. D 41%
FL U.S. House-8 Bill Posey R 17%
FL U.S. House-11 Daniel Webster R 20%
FL U.S. House-12 Gus Bilirakis R 23%
FL U.S. House-15 Dennis Ross R 10%
FL U.S. House-21 Lois Frankel D 86%
FL U.S. House-23 Debbie Wasserman Schultz D 50%
FL U.S. House-24 Frederica Wilson D 82%
FL U.S. House-25 Mario Diaz-Balart R 4%
FL State House-9 Loranne Ausley D 86%
FL State House-83 Gayle Harrell R 27%
FL State Senate-4 Aaron Bean R 19%
FL State Senate-9 David Simmons R 4%
FL State Senate-12 Dennis Baxley R 4%
FL State Senate-16 Jack Latvala R 28%
FL State Senate-20 Tom Lee R 30%
FL State Senate-25 Joe Negron R 23%
FL State Senate-36 Rene Garcia R 9%
FL Chief Financial Officer Jeffrey Atwater R 32%
FL Mayor-At-Large John Seiler 65%
FL Council Member-3 Lee Constantine 30%
FL Council Member-8 Katrina Brown 52%
FL Commissioner-1 Sandra Murman 9%
FL Commissioner-2 Victor Crist 33%
FL Commissioner-3 Charlie Justice 91%
FL Commissioner-3 Lesley Miller, Jr. D 50%
FL Commissioner-4 Sally Heyman 89%
FL Representative-At-Large Joyce Cusack D 92%
J.D. Alexander 6%
Bob Allen 0%
William Andrews 17%
Nancy Argenziano 35%
Ralph Arza 8%
Frank Attkisson 5%
Carey Baker 9%
Randy Ball 5%
Gustavo Barreiro 5%
Dorothy Bendross-Mindingall 52%
Michael Bennett 7%
Allan George Bense 4%
Holly Benson 5%
Kim Berfield 13%
Annie Betancourt 74%
Marsha Bowen 5%
Donald Brown 0%
Ginny Brown-Waite 44%
Fredrick Brummer 11%
Phillip Brutus 58%
Susan Bucher 75%
Edward Bullard 64%
Locke Burt 20%
Johnnie Byrd, Jr. 4%
Walter Campbell, Jr. 42%
Gaston Cantens 11%
John Carassas 27%
Lisa Carlton 24%
Donna Clarke 10%
Charles Clary 30%
Anna Cowin 33%
Larry Crow 33%
Don Davis 5%
Mandy Dawson 56%
Nancy Detert 23%
Alex Diaz de la Portilla 29%
Renier Diaz de la Portilla 11%
Paula Dockery 13%
John Dyer, Jr. 50%
Frank Farkas 18%
Mike Fasano 11%
Tom Feeney 0%
Terry Fields 82%
Heather Fiorentino 37%
Mark Flanagan 30%
Anne Gannon 82%
Rodolfo Garcia, Jr. 18%
Andy Gardiner 8%
Dan Gelber 82%
Steven Geller 40%
Hugh Gibson III 5%
J. Dudley Goodlette 11%
Kenneth Allan Gottlieb 62%
Carole Green 10%
Ronald Greenstein 62%
Mike Haridopolos 9%
James Harper, Jr. 64%
Lindsay Harrington 3%
Chris Hart IV 4%
Bob Henriquez 76%
Mike Hogan 5%
Wilbert Theodore Holloway 48%
Betty Smith Holzendorf 50%
Edward Jennings, Jr. 59%
Randy Johnson 16%
Daryl Jones 53%
Stan Jordan 5%
Arthenia Joyner 79%
Jim Kallinger 4%
Will Kendrick 46%
Bev Kilmer 8%
James King, Jr. 25%
Ron Klein 33%
Suzanne Kosmas 85%
Jeff Kottkamp 10%
Dick Kravitz 28%
Bruce Kyle 4%
Carlos Lacasa 26%
John Laurent 17%
Cindy Lerner 86%
Ken Littlefield 13%
Evelyn Lynn 31%
Richard Machek 54%
Connie Mack IV 9%
Mark Mahon 4%
Stan Mayfield 4%
Jerry Louis Maygarden 15%
Perry McGriff, Jr. 86%
John McKay 27%
Matthew Meadows 67%
David Mealor 16%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 50%
Jerry Melvin 9%
Richard Mitchell 41%
Mitch Needelman 8%
Jerry Paul 9%
Durell Peaden, Jr. 29%
Frank Peterman, Jr. 91%
Joe Pickens 5%
Manuel Prieguez 9%
Ken Pruitt 15%
Nan Rich 91%
Curtis Richardson 82%
Stacy Ritter 71%
Sara Romeo 91%
Thomas Rossin 47%
Dave Russell, Jr. 23%
Timothy Ryan 75%
Debby Sanderson 18%
Burt Saunders 24%
Jim Sebesta 31%
Ronald Silver 39%
Gary Siplin 60%
Irving Slosberg 64%
Christopher Smith 68%
Rod Smith 46%
Eleanor Sobel 83%
Ken Sorensen 19%
Joseph Spratt 9%
Dwight Stansel 36%
Allen Trovillion 5%
J. Alex Villalobos 20%
Rob Wallace 9%
Leslie Waters 23%
Mark Weissman 91%
Douglass Wiles 75%
Roger Brian Wishner 67%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.