Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Florida League of Conservation Voters

2000 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
FL U.S. Senate Sr Marco Rubio Republican 4%
FL U.S. House 11 Daniel Webster Republican 23%
FL U.S. House 12 Gus Bilirakis Republican 4%
FL U.S. House 21 Lois Frankel Democratic 71%
FL U.S. House 24 Frederica Wilson Democratic 60%
FL State Senate 20 Tom Lee Republican 50%
FL Commissioner 1 Sandra Murman 15%
FL Commissioner 4 Sally Heyman 76%
J.D. Alexander 14%
William Andrews 18%
Nancy Argenziano 12%
Randy Ball 13%
Gustavo Barreiro 7%
Allan George Bense 5%
Annie Betancourt 45%
Ginny Brown-Waite 42%
Fredrick Brummer 7%
Susan Bucher 80%
Locke Burt 37%
Johnnie Byrd, Jr. 13%
Walter Campbell, Jr. 37%
Gaston Cantens 16%
Lisa Carlton 43%
Charles Clary 58%
Anna Cowin 50%
Larry Crow 51%
Mandy Dawson 53%
Nancy Detert 11%
Alex Diaz de la Portilla 57%
Renier Diaz de la Portilla 39%
Paula Dockery 20%
John Dyer, Jr. 41%
Frank Farkas 18%
Mike Fasano 6%
Tom Feeney 11%
Heather Fiorentino 30%
Mark Flanagan 22%
Steven Geller 58%
J. Dudley Goodlette 43%
Kenneth Allan Gottlieb 65%
Carole Green 5%
Ronald Greenstein 59%
Lindsay Harrington 6%
Chris Hart IV 31%
Bob Henriquez 71%
Betty Smith Holzendorf 33%
Randy Johnson 15%
Daryl Jones 48%
Bev Kilmer 10%
James King, Jr. 44%
Ron Klein 50%
Suzanne Kosmas 75%
Bruce Kyle 13%
Carlos Lacasa 28%
Jack Latvala 53%
John Laurent 41%
Denise Lee 51%
Ken Littlefield 13%
Evelyn Lynn 30%
Jerry Louis Maygarden 7%
John McKay 42%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 42%
Jerry Melvin 9%
Richard Mitchell 44%
Manuel Prieguez 13%
Stacy Ritter 73%
Thomas Rossin 52%
Dave Russell, Jr. 28%
Timothy Ryan 52%
Burt Saunders 50%
Jim Sebesta 48%
Ronald Silver 47%
Christopher Smith 68%
Eleanor Sobel 65%
Ken Sorensen 5%
Joseph Spratt 5%
Dwight Stansel 15%
Donald Sullivan 45%
Allen Trovillion 8%
Rob Wallace 10%
Leslie Waters 19%
Douglass Wiles 42%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top