Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: League of Conservation Voters Rocky Mountain Office

1998 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 20%
CO U.S. House 7 Ed Perlmutter Democratic 100%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 70%
Kay Alexander 60%
Deborah Colleen Allen 44%
Ken Arnold 18%
Bob Bacon 100%
Gayle Berry 60%
Charles Thomas Blickensderfer 18%
Nolbert Chavez 100%
Ken Chlouber 45%
Benjamin Clarke 100%
Jim Congrove 18%
Douglas Allen Dean 0%
Ginette Dennis 45%
Michael Francis Feeley 100%
Russell Lloyd George 70%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon 100%
Dorothy Gotlieb 50%
Daniel Grossman 100%
Bob Hagedorn 70%
Lynn Christian Hefley 33%
Robert Michael Hernandez 100%
William Kaufman 80%
Maryanne Keller 100%
Elsie Lacy 33%
Joyce Lawrence 70%
Gloria Leyba 100%
Douglas Linkhart 100%
Frana Araujo Mace 100%
Robert Martinez 91%
Stanley Matsunaka 73%
Ronny May 40%
Andrew McElhany 30%
Gary McPherson 30%
Carl Miller 70%
Marcy Morrison 90%
Mark Paschall 25%
Pat Pascoe 91%
Penn Pfiffner 10%
Terry Phillips 100%
Ray Powers 27%
Peggy Reeves 91%
Dorothy Rupert 100%
Todd Saliman 100%
William Sinclair 50%
Matt Smith 60%
Lola Spradley 40%
Bryan Sterling Sullivant 80%
William Swenson 60%
Stephanie Takis 90%
Gloria Travis Tanner 82%
Penfield Tate III 100%
Jack Taylor 44%
MaryAnne Tebedo 13%
Bill Thiebaut, Jr. 100%
Stephen Tool 70%
Ron Tupa 100%
Jennifer Veiga 100%
Dave Wattenberg 55%
Frank Weddig 73%
Dorothy Wham 45%
Suzanne Williams 90%
Tambor Williams 60%
Bradley Young 40%
Paul A. Zimmerman 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top