or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: League of Conservation Voters Rocky Mountain Office

2000 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 20%
CO U.S. House 7 Ed Perlmutter Democratic 90%
CO State Senate 24 Lois Tochtrop Democratic 92%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 25%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 25%
CO Director of the Public Utilities Commission Douglas Allen Dean 17%
Kay Alexander 33%
Norma Anderson 40%
John Andrews 20%
Ken Arnold 20%
Bob Bacon 100%
Gayle Berry 50%
Nolbert Chavez 100%
Ken Chlouber 30%
Lauri Clapp 25%
Fran Coleman 100%
Richard Decker 10%
F. Jim Dyer 70%
Mary Ellen Epps 30%
John Evans 50%
Rob Fairbank 25%
Daniel Grossman 100%
Lynn Christian Hefley 18%
Robert Michael Hernandez 90%
Mark Hillman 30%
Diane Hoppe 33%
Kenneth Kester 33%
Mark Larson 67%
Joyce Lawrence 58%
Don Lee 17%
Douglas Linkhart 90%
Frana Araujo Mace 92%
Stanley Matsunaka 88%
Carl Miller 42%
Shawn Mitchell 17%
Marilyn Musgrave 40%
Alice Nichol 70%
Joe Nunez 25%
David Owen 40%
Mark Paschall 17%
Pat Pascoe 90%
Terry Phillips 100%
Tom Plant 100%
Ann Ragsdale 100%
Peggy Reeves 90%
Todd Saliman 100%
Glenn Scott 58%
William Sinclair 25%
Matt Smith 33%
Nancy Spence 33%
Lola Spradley 17%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 58%
William Swenson 58%
Abel Tapia 100%
Ronald Teck 50%
Bill Thiebaut, Jr. 80%
Jennifer Veiga 100%
Valentin Vigil 92%
William Webster 33%
Suzanne Williams 100%
Tambor Williams 45%
John Witwer 75%
Bradley Young 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top