Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Montana Education Association-Montana Federation of Teachers

1997 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
ID State Senate 2 Steve Vick Republican 0%
MT State Senate 44 Fred Thomas Republican 40%
Darrel Adams 8%
Chris Marie Ahner 23%
Shiell Anderson 46%
Joseph Barnett 23%
Beverly Barnhart 85%
Sue Bartlett 90%
Tom Beck 90%
Ernest Bergsagel 38%
Al Bishop 80%
Rodney Bitney 15%
Sylvia Bookout-Reinicke 46%
Matt Brainard 15%
B. F. Christiaens 100%
Robert Clark 23%
John Cobb 46%
Mack Cole 60%
Bruce Crippen 70%
William Crismore 70%
Aubyn Curtiss 23%
Robert DePratu 60%
Gerry Devlin 50%
Steve Doherty 100%
Dorothy Eck 100%
David Ewer 100%
Eve Franklin 100%
Kim Gillan 100%
William Glaser 80%
Lorents Grosfield 70%
Antoinette Hagener 100%
Mike Halligan 100%
Marian Hanson 46%
Don Hargrove 40%
John Harp 70%
Hal Harper 100%
Dan Harrington 100%
John Hertel 80%
Chase Hibbard 85%
Ric Holden 50%
Joan Hurdle 100%
Reiny Jabs 70%
Greg Jergeson 100%
Royal Johnson 69%
Rick Jore 0%
Betty Lou Kasten 23%
Thomas Keating 40%
Sam Kitzenberg 100%
Billie Krenzler 100%
Bob Lawson 77%
John Lynch 100%
Dale Mahlum 80%
Gay Ann Masolo 77%
Matt McCann 50%
Bea McCarthy 100%
Linda McCulloch 100%
Daniel McGee 18%
Walter McNutt 70%
William Menahan 100%
John Mercer 38%
Kenneth Lee Mesaros 70%
Ken Miller 40%
Arnie Mohl 60%
Brad Molnar 23%
Doug Mood 46%
Linda Nelson 100%
Karl Ohs 46%
Scott James Orr 8%
Robert Pavlovich 100%
Ray Peck 77%
Joe Quilici 100%
Bob Raney 83%
William Rehbein, Jr. 15%
John Rose 69%
Brennan Ryan 85%
Trudi Schmidt 100%
Bruce Simon 69%
Paul Sliter 23%
Loren Soft 46%
Mike Sprague 50%
Carolyn Squires 92%
Barry Stang 100%
Emily Stonington 100%
Robert Story, Jr. 46%
Jay Stovall 54%
Charles Swysgood 60%
Bill Tash 69%
Lila Taylor 54%
Mike Taylor 30%
Daryl Toews 56%
Cliff Trexler 62%
Joseph Tropila 92%
Carley Tuss 100%
Douglas Wagner 23%
Allan Walters 23%
Mignon Waterman 90%
Bill Wilson 100%
Diana E. Wyatt 92%
Tom Zook 46%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top