Rating Group: Virginia Chamber of Commerce

1999 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
VA U.S. House-4 Donald McEachin D 54%
VA U.S. House-9 Morgan Griffith R 77%
VA State House-1 Terry Kilgore R 63%
VA State House-13 Bob Marshall R 61%
VA State House-22 Kathy Byron R 90%
VA State House-25 Steve Landes R 70%
VA State House-28 William Howell R 78%
VA State House-36 Ken Plum D 39%
VA State House-39 Vivian Watts D 42%
VA State House-42 David Albo R 83%
VA State House-54 Bobby Orrock, Sr. R 70%
VA State House-62 Riley Ingram R 79%
VA State House-65 Lee Ware, Jr. R 81%
VA State House-66 Kirk Cox R 86%
VA State House-76 Chris Jones R 74%
VA State Senate-3 Thomas Norment, Jr. R 92%
VA State Senate-5 Lionell Spruill, Sr. D 45%
VA State Senate-7 Frank Wagner R 90%
VA State Senate-13 Richard Hayden Black R 83%
VA State Senate-15 Frank Ruff, Jr. R 73%
VA State Senate-18 Louise Lucas D 71%
VA State Senate-21 John Edwards D 48%
VA State Senate-23 Stephen Newman R 94%
VA State Senate-24 Emmett Hanger, Jr. R 89%
VA State Senate-25 Creigh Deeds D 50%
VA State Senate-32 Janet Howell D 70%
VA State Senate-35 Dick Saslaw D 76%
VA Justice of the Supreme Court Bill Mims 79%
VA Mayor-At-Large Dwight Jones 50%
VA State Board of Education James Dillard II 59%
Watkins Abbitt, Jr. 65%
James Frederick Almand 39%
Ward Armstrong 39%
Thomas Graham Baker, Jr. 61%
William Barlow 38%
Warren Barry 85%
Viola Osborne Baskerville 39%
Irving Vincent Behm, Jr. 80%
William Welden Bennett, Jr. 52%
Harry Blevins 65%
Robert Bloxom 76%
Bill Bolling 89%
Robert Brink 38%
L. Bryant, Jr. 88%
Vince Callahan, Jr. 52%
Eric Cantor 92%
John Chichester 81%
Mary Taylor Christian 30%
Whittington Whiteside Clement 59%
Charles Colgan, Sr. 76%
J. Paul Councill, Jr. 62%
Emily Couric 55%
Charles Cranwell 44%
Flora Davis Crittenden 55%
Glenn Croshaw 55%
L. Karen Darner 32%
Butch Davies III 60%
Jo Ann Davis 70%
Barnie Day 57%
Jay Wayne DeBoer 53%
Jeannemarie Devolites Davis 85%
Alan Arnold Diamonstein 55%
Vivian Earl Dickinson 64%
Thelma Drake 76%
Allen Wayne Dudley 83%
Randy Forbes 83%
Joseph Gartlan, Jr. 44%
George Wallace Grayson 45%
Andy Guest, Jr. 76%
Franklin Hall 46%
Phillip Hamilton 82%
Frank Hargrove, Sr. 60%
Paul Clinton Harris, Sr. 87%
Charles Hawkins 89%
Richard Joyner Holland 71%
Edd Houck 58%
Robert Hull 57%
Thomas Micajah Jackson, Jr. 50%
Johnny Joannou 33%
Joseph Johnson, Jr. 42%
Jerrauld Jones 32%
Jay Kenneth Katzen 86%
Gladys Brown Keating 41%
Benjamin Joseph Lambert III 67%
Henry Marsh III 67%
Stephen Martin 89%
Madison Ellis Marye 74%
W. Henry Maxwell 69%
Joe May 82%
Roger John McClure 87%
Bob McDonnell 81%
Michéle McQuigg 67%
Kenneth Melvin 26%
Kevin Grey Miller 76%
Yvonne Miller 40%
Brian Moran 42%
Harvey Morgan 70%
Thomas Warren Moss, Jr. 38%
William Tayloe Murphy, Jr. 47%
Samuel Nixon, Jr. 90%
Harry Parrish 65%
Clarence Phillips 36%
Harry Potts, Jr. 67%
Phillip Puckett 74%
Toddy Puller 50%
Bob Purkey 81%
Lacey Putney 76%
Frederick Quayle 84%
John Spence Reid 84%
William Reynolds 60%
Anne Gregory Rhodes 63%
William Peters Robinson, Jr. 32%
John Adams Rollison III 76%
John Howson Rust, Jr. 79%
Edward Schrock 82%
James Scott 60%
Beverly Sherwood 73%
James Shuler 52%
Kenneth Stolle 86%
Walter Stosch 86%
Jackie Thomas Stump 48%
Robert Tata 75%
John Harvey Tate, Jr. 41%
Alfred Victor Thomas 42%
Patricia Ticer 68%
Malfourd Trumbo 95%
Marian Amelia Van Landingham 36%
Mitchell Van Yahres 40%
Stanley Clay Walker 67%
William Wampler, Jr. 71%
Leo Wardrup, Jr. 75%
John Watkins 79%
Glenn Weatherholtz 75%
Mary Margaret Whipple 58%
S. Vance Wilkins, Jr. 80%
Donald Williams 48%
Martin Williams 88%
Clifton Alexander Woodrum 52%
Jane Haycock Woods 83%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.