Rating Group: Wyoming Prosperity Project

2008 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
WY State House-32 Timothy Hallinan R 88%
WY State House-37 Steve Harshman R 81%
WY State House-39 Stan Blake D 72%
WY State House-40 Michael Madden R 81%
WY State House-43 Daniel Zwonitzer R 70%
WY State House-55 David Miller R 36%
WY State Senate-3 Curt Meier R 66%
WY State Senate-13 John Hastert D 66%
WY State Senate-18 Henry Coe R 66%
WY State Senate-19 R. Peterson R 75%
WY State Senate-21 Bruce Burns R 58%
WY State Senate-24 Michael Von Flatern R 75%
WY State Senate-25 Cale Case R 16%
WY State Senate-26 Eli Bebout R 75%
WY State Senate-27 Bill Landen R 66%
WY State Senate-29 Drew Perkins R 66%
WY State Senate-30 Charles Scott R 41%
WY State Board of Education Kathryn Sessions D 58%
James Anderson 75%
Rodney Anderson 72%
George Bagby 63%
Rosie Berger 90%
Bob Brechtel 63%
Kermit Brown 90%
Ed Buchanan 72%
Charles Childers 80%
Roy Cohee 81%
Stan Cooper 83%
Bernadine Craft 72%
Kathy Davison 70%
Ken Decaria 66%
Ross Diercks 63%
Amy Edmonds 81%
Ken Esquibel 72%
Gerald Geis 83%
Keith Gingery 72%
Patrick Goggles 63%
Mary Hales 80%
Debbie Hammons 81%
Elaine Harvey 72%
John Hines 66%
Pete Illoway 72%
Allen Jaggi 81%
Kit Jennings 75%
Wayne Johnson 75%
Peter Jorgensen 81%
Jack Landon, Jr. 90%
Grant Larson 66%
Tom Lockhart 70%
Tom Lubnau II 81%
Mike Massie 58%
Del McOmie 81%
Erin Mercer 63%
Saundra Meyer 72%
Lori Millin 72%
Philip Nicholas 58%
Owen Petersen 81%
Frank Philp 54%
Lorraine Quarberg 72%
Tony Ross 66%
John Schiffer 66%
Mark Semlek 63%
Lisa Shepperson 63%
Colin Simpson 81%
William Steward 80%
Tim Stubson 80%
Matt Teeters 63%
Bill Thompson 63%
Mary Throne 72%
Charles Townsend 83%
Bill Vasey 75%
Sue Wallis 72%
David Zwonitzer 63%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.