Rating Group: Wyoming Prosperity Project

2005 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
WY U.S. Senate-Jr John Barrasso R 100%
WY State House-37 Steve Harshman R 85%
WY State House-43 Daniel Zwonitzer R 93%
WY State House-55 David Miller R 73%
WY State Senate-3 Curt Meier R 86%
WY State Senate-13 John Hastert D 100%
WY State Senate-18 Henry Coe R 80%
WY State Senate-19 R. Peterson R 100%
WY State Senate-21 Bruce Burns R 93%
WY State Senate-23 Jeff Wasserburger R 93%
WY State Senate-24 Michael Von Flatern R 85%
WY State Senate-25 Cale Case R 53%
WY State Senate-30 Charles Scott R 66%
WY State Board of Education Kathryn Sessions D 86%
Deborah Alden 86%
James Anderson 93%
Rodney Anderson 93%
Patricia Aullman 93%
George Bagby 100%
Bruce Barnard 100%
Rosie Berger 93%
Tex Boggs 93%
Bob Brechtel 86%
Kermit Brown 100%
Ed Buchanan 93%
Kurt Bucholz 86%
Charles Childers 100%
Roy Cohee 100%
Stan Cooper 100%
Kathy Davison 86%
Ken Decaria 73%
Ross Diercks 100%
David Edwards 85%
Floyd Esquibel 93%
Gerald Gay 93%
Gerald Geis 86%
Mary Meyer Gilmore 80%
Keith Gingery 93%
Patrick Goggles 93%
James Hageman 93%
Debbie Hammons 93%
John Hanes 93%
Elaine Harvey 78%
Bill Hawks 86%
Becket Hinckley 86%
John Hines 80%
Jerry Iekel 93%
Pete Illoway 93%
Burke Jackson 84%
Kit Jennings 86%
Rae Lynn Job 93%
Wayne Johnson 93%
Alan Jones 85%
Peter Jorgensen 100%
Jack Landon, Jr. 93%
Grant Larson 100%
Frank Latta 72%
Tom Lockhart 100%
Tom Lubnau II 80%
Randall Luthi 100%
Marty Martin 93%
Mike Massie 93%
Del McOmie 93%
R. Larry Meuli 80%
E. Jayne Mockler 86%
Layton Morgan 93%
Philip Nicholas 93%
Monte Olsen 93%
Douglas Osborn 100%
Robert Peck 100%
Bryan Pedersen 100%
Owen Petersen 100%
Frank Philp 92%
Mick Powers 100%
Lorraine Quarberg 93%
Paul Wayne Reese 92%
Ann Robinson 93%
Tony Ross 100%
Doug Samuelson 92%
John Schiffer 86%
Mark Semlek 93%
Colin Simpson 92%
James Slater 100%
Bill Thompson 93%
Charles Townsend 80%
Bill Vasey 93%
Tom Walsh 86%
Jane Warren 92%
Stephen Watt 100%
Kevin White 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.