Rating Group: Washington Conservation Voters

2003-2004 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
WA U.S. House-4 Dan Newhouse R 22%
WA U.S. House-5 Cathy McMorris Rodgers R 13%
WA State House-3 Position 2 Timm Ormsby D 100%
WA State House-5 Position 1 Jay Rodne R 75%
WA State House-11 Position 1 Zack Hudgins D 100%
WA State House-12 Position 1 Cary Condotta R 11%
WA State House-15 Position 1 Bruce Chandler R 11%
WA State House-19 Position 2 Brian Blake D 44%
WA State House-20 Position 1 Richard DeBolt R 22%
WA State House-20 Position 2 Ed Orcutt R 11%
WA State House-25 Position 2 Joyce McDonald R 33%
WA State House-29 Position 2 Steve Kirby D 78%
WA State House-32 Position 2 Ruth Kagi D 89%
WA State House-34 Position 1 Eileen Cody D 78%
WA State House-37 Position 1 Sharon Tomiko Santos D 78%
WA State House-37 Position 2 Eric Pettigrew D 89%
WA State House-39 Position 1 Dan Kristiansen R 11%
WA State House-40 Position 2 Jeff Morris D 78%
WA State House-41 Position 2 Judy Clibborn D 78%
WA State House-43 Position 2 Frank Chopp D 78%
WA State House-44 Position 1 John Lovick D 78%
WA State Senate-9 Mark Schoesler R 38%
WA State Senate-10 Barbara Bailey R 33%
WA State Senate-15 Jim Honeyford R 0%
WA State Senate-22 Sam Hunt D 100%
WA State Senate-27 Jeannie Darneille D 89%
WA State Senate-29 Steve Conway D 78%
WA State Senate-30 Mark Miloscia R 89%
WA State Senate-32 Maralyn Chase D 100%
WA State Senate-33 Karen Keiser D 86%
WA State Senate-35 Timothy Sheldon D 25%
WA State Senate-38 John McCoy D 100%
WA State Senate-39 Kirk Pearson R 11%
WA State Senate-42 Doug Ericksen R 11%
WA Council Member-1 Dan Roach 29%
WA Council Member-2 Pam Roach 14%
WA Council Member-2 Brian Sullivan 89%
WA Council Member-5 Hans Dunshee D 89%
WA Council Member-5 Dave Upthegrove 100%
WA Council Member-8 Joe McDermott 89%
WA Council Member-At-Large Toby Nixon R 67%
WA Commissioner-1 Jerome Delvin 22%
WA Commissioner-1 Tom Mielke R 14%
WA Commissioner-2 Sandra Romero D 100%
John Ahern 11%
Gary Alexander 22%
Glenn Anderson 56%
Mike Armstrong 11%
Brad Benson 22%
Donald Benton 36%
Jean Berkey 60%
Marc Boldt 22%
Dale Brandland 36%
Lisa Brown 86%
Jim Buck 44%
Roger Bush 22%
Jack Cairnes 22%
Tom Campbell 38%
Don Carlson 64%
Michael Carrell 22%
Jim Clements 11%
Mike Cooper 100%
Don Cox 11%
Larry Crouse 22%
Alex Deccio 15%
Mary Lou Dickerson 100%
Mark Doumit 36%
Jeanne Edwards 67%
William Eickmeyer 75%
Tracey Eide 79%
Luke Esser 36%
Darlene Fairley 86%
Bill Finkbeiner 50%
Dennis Flannigan 75%
Rosa Franklin 86%
Karen Fraser 85%
Bill Fromhold 89%
Bill Grant 67%
Kathy Haigh 78%
Patricia Hale 21%
Shirley Hankins 22%
Jim Hargrove 36%
Brian Hatfield 44%
Mary Haugen 71%
Mike Hewitt 21%
Bill Hinkle 22%
Janéa Holmquist Newbry 22%
James Horn 21%
Ross Hunter 89%
Ken Jacobsen 71%
Fred Jarrett 67%
Stephen Johnson 14%
Jim Kastama 79%
Phyllis Kenney 89%
Lynn Kessler 67%
Adam Kline 100%
Jeanne Kohl-Welles 100%
Patricia Lantz 78%
Kelli Linville 78%
Dave Mastin 43%
Rosemary McAuliffe 93%
Robert McCaslin, Sr. 21%
Jim McIntire 89%
Lois McMahan 22%
Jim Moeller 78%
Dawn Morrell 100%
Bob Morton 7%
Joyce Mulliken 14%
Brian Murray 20%
Edward Murray 100%
Al O'Brien 89%
Robert Oke 21%
Linda Parlette 21%
Cheryl Pflug 40%
Erik Poulsen 93%
Margarita Prentice 79%
Skip Priest 67%
Dave Quall 78%
Marilyn Rasmussen 57%
Debbie Regala 93%
Phil Rockefeller 78%
Laura Ruderman 89%
Lynn Schindler 11%
Dave Schmidt 21%
Shay Schual-Berke 100%
Barry Sehlin 38%
Jan Shabro 44%
Larry Sheahan 21%
Betti Sheldon 71%
Paull Shin 77%
David Simpson 100%
Geoff Simpson 100%
Mary Skinner 13%
Helen Sommers 89%
Harriet Spanel 86%
Val Stevens 14%
Bob Sump 11%
Dan Swecker 21%
Georganne Talcott 22%
Patricia Thibaudeau 100%
Rodney Tom 67%
Velma Veloria 88%
Deb Wallace 100%
Shirley Winsley 71%
Alex Wood 100%
Beverly Woods 33%
Joseph Zarelli 21%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »