Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: California Communities United Institute

2010 Women's Issues Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo 96%
CA State Senate 1 Ted Gaines Republican 60%
CA Supervisor 1 Kevin Jeffries 63%
CA U.S. House 2 Jared Huffman Democratic 95%
CA Council Member 3 Bob Blumenfield 95%
CA Supervisor 4 Curt Hagman 58%
CA State Senate 4 Jim Nielsen Republican 60%
CA State Senate 5 Cathleen Galgiani Democratic 98%
CA Supervisor 5 Joe Simitian No Party Affiliation 100%
CA Council Member 7 Felipe Fuentes 95%
CA State Senate 8 Tom Berryhill Republican 65%
CA U.S. House 8 Paul Cook Republican 63%
CA Council Member 9 Curren Price, Jr. 93%
CA State Senate 9 Nancy Skinner Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 10 Jeff Denham Republican 39%
CA U.S. House 11 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 13 Gerald Hill Democratic 98%
CA State Senate 15 Jim Beall, Jr. Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 16 Jean Fuller Republican 55%
CA State Senate 17 Bill Monning Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 24 Kevin de Leon Democratic 98%
CA U.S. House 25 Steve Knight Republican 63%
CA State Senate 25 Anthony Portantino, Jr. Democratic 98%
CA U.S. House 26 Julia Brownley Democratic 100%
CA State Assembly 30 Anna Caballero Democratic 90%
CA State Senate 32 Tony Mendoza Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 33 Ted Lieu Democratic 93%
CA State Senate 35 Steven Bradford Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 35 Norma Torres Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 37 Karen Bass Democratic 93%
CA State Senate 38 Joel Anderson Republican 55%
CA U.S. House 45 Mimi Walters Republican 43%
CA U.S. House 46 Lou Correa Democratic 71%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 96%
CA Council Member Ward 3 Jose Solorio 100%
CA Mayor At-Large Mary Salas 100%
CA Mayor At-Large Darrell Steinberg Democratic 93%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla Democratic 96%
CA State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Non-partisan 100%
Samuel Aanestad 46%
Anthony Adams 65%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Juan Arambula 100%
Roy Ashburn 61%
Bill Berryhill 68%
Sam Blakeslee 14%
Martin Block 95%
Joan Buchanan 100%
Charles Calderon 90%
Ron Calderon 100%
Amina Carter 100%
Wesley Chesbro 100%
David Cogdill 39%
Connie Conway 60%
Ellen Corbett 96%
Joe Coto 98%
Mike Davis 95%
Hector De La Torre 98%
Charles DeVore 60%
Denise Ducheny 96%
Robert Dutton 43%
Mike Eng 100%
Noreen Evans 98%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 65%
Dean Florez 100%
Paul Fong 100%
Warren Furutani 88%
Martin Garrick 65%
Mike Gatto 100%
Danny Gilmore 63%
Isadore Hall III 95%
Loni Hancock 89%
Diane Harkey 58%
Tom Harman 46%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Roger Hernandez 100%
Dennis Hollingsworth 43%
Alyson Huber 85%
Robert Huff 43%
Dave Jones 98%
Christine Kehoe 100%
Mark Leno 93%
Carol Liu 100%
Dan Logue 58%
Bonnie Lowenthal 95%
Fiona Ma 100%
Jeff Miller 55%
Pedro Nava 98%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 82%
Brian Nestande 65%
Roger Niello 60%
Chris Norby 53%
Jenny Oropeza 57%
Fran Pavley 96%
John Pérez 95%
Manuel Pérez 93%
Gloria Romero 100%
George Runner, Jr. 46%
Ira Ruskin 100%
Lori Saldaña 100%
Jim Silva 58%
Cameron Smyth 58%
Tony Strickland 46%
Audra Strickland 65%
Sandré Swanson 100%
Alberto Torrico 95%
Van Tran 65%
Mike Villines 68%
Patricia Wiggins 50%
Lois Wolk 100%
Roderick Wright 89%
Mark Wyland 57%
Mariko Yamada 100%
Leland Yee 86%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top