Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Mississippi Association of Educators

1997 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
MS State House 10 Nolan Mettetal Republican 95%
MS State House 16 Stephen Holland Democratic 83%
MS State House 30 Robert Huddleston Democratic 92%
MS State House 32 Willie Perkins, Sr. Democratic 95%
MS State House 33 Thomas Reynolds II Democratic 83%
MS State House 38 Tyrone Ellis Democratic 92%
MS State House 39 Jeffrey Smith Republican 69%
MS State House 49 Willie Bailey Democratic 90%
MS State House 51 Rufus Straughter Democratic 92%
MS State House 57 Edward Blackmon, Jr. Democratic 92%
MS State House 60 John Moore Republican 51%
MS State House 61 Ray Rogers Republican 91%
MS State House 62 Tom Weathersby, Sr. Republican 92%
MS State House 64 Bill Denny, Jr. Republican 66%
MS State House 67 Earle Banks Democratic 92%
MS State House 69 Alyce Clarke Democratic 92%
MS State House 80 Omeria Scott Democratic 92%
MS State House 85 America Middleton Democratic 92%
MS State House 94 Robert Johnson III Democratic 91%
MS State House 98 David Myers Democratic 91%
MS State House 103 Percy Watson Democratic 87%
MS State House 112 John Read Republican 79%
MS State Senate 3 Nickey Browning Republican 89%
MS State Senate 7 Hob Bryan Democratic 93%
MS State Senate 9 Gray Tollison Republican 90%
MS State Senate 13 Willie Simmons Democratic 83%
MS State Senate 14 Lydia Chassaniol Republican 77%
MS State Senate 21 Barbara Blackmon Democratic 89%
MS State Senate 24 David Jordan Democratic 89%
MS State Senate 26 John Horhn Democratic 89%
MS State Senate 27 Hillman Frazier Democratic 89%
MS State Senate 30 Dean Kirby Republican 66%
MS State Senate 31 Terry Burton Republican 95%
MS State Senate 32 Sampson Jackson II Democratic 89%
MS State Senate 37 Bob Dearing Democratic 89%
MS State Senate 50 Tommy Gollott Republican 89%
MS Commissioner of Revenue Herbert Frierson Republican 92%
Jim Crawley Barnett 92%
Lester Barnett, Jr. 60%
William Bowles 94%
Billy Broomfield 92%
Thomas Cameron III 51%
William Ward Canon 66%
Charles Wilson Capps, Jr. 92%
Neely Carlton 92%
Robert Clark, Jr. 92%
Linda Coleman 92%
Mary Coleman 92%
Joseph Compretta 92%
Scottie Cuevas 83%
Ricky Cummings 92%
Lee Jarrell Davis 78%
Dirk Dedeaux 92%
George Dickerson 89%
Reecy Dickson 91%
Blaine Eaton II 91%
James Ellington 60%
Joe Ellzey 92%
James Evans 83%
Ronald David Farris 87%
George Flaggs, Jr. 92%
Timothy Alan Ford 92%
Mark Formby 69%
Jamie Franks, Jr. 92%
Frances Fredericks 92%
Vernon Delma Furniss 89%
Jack Gadd 92%
David Gibbs 92%
Carl Gordon, Jr. 95%
David Green 77%
Joe Grist, Jr. 92%
Daniel Guice, Jr. 92%
Edwin Glenn Hamilton 89%
Frank Hamilton 78%
Alice Harden 92%
Clayton Henderson 91%
William Hewes III 69%
Tommy Horne 51%
Bobby Howell 78%
Joe Hudson 92%
Michael Janus 69%
Tim Johnson 89%
Andrew Ketchings 60%
Ezell Lee 95%
Travis Little 83%
R.L. Livingston 92%
Bennett Malone 92%
Percy Maples 92%
James Markham, Jr. 91%
Rita Martinson 78%
Warner McBride 92%
William McCoy 93%
William Miles 92%
William Minor 95%
Thomas Mitchell 92%
Robert Moak 83%
T.O. Moffatt 66%
Keith Norris Montgomery, Sr. 33%
Robert Moody 92%
E. Harvey Moss 92%
Clem Mullins Nettles 92%
Alan Nunnelee 89%
Diane Peranich 92%
Lynn Posey 89%
John Raymond Reeves 83%
Thomas Robertson 89%
Valeria Brower Robertson 69%
Eric Robinson 60%
Walter Robinson, Jr. 76%
Clinton Rotenberry, Jr. 80%
Vincent Scoper, Jr. 77%
Eloise Hale Scott 92%
Bobby Shows 91%
James Simpson, Jr. 92%
Charles Smith 78%
Ferr Smith 92%
Robert Harold Smith 83%
Mary Stevens 78%
Joseph Thomas Stogner 89%
Johnny Stringer 83%
Bobby Taylor 92%
Billy Thames 89%
Jimmy Thornton 87%
Bennie Turner 93%
Tom Wallace 87%
Johnnie Walls, Jr. 89%
Joseph Warren 74%
Carmen Wells-Smith 60%
John Robert White 77%
Richard White 66%
Tommy Woods 65%
Charles Young, Sr. 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top