Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund

2014 Positions on Gun Rights

Issues: Guns
State Office District Name Party Rating
SC State House 3 Gary Clary Republican 0%
SC State House 4 Davey Hiott Republican 93%
SC State House 5 Neal Collins Republican 86%
SC State House 8 Jonathon Hill Republican 93%
SC State House 17 Mike Burns Republican 93%
SC State House 20 Daniel Hamilton Republican 93%
SC State House 21 Phyllis Henderson Republican 93%
SC State House 24 Bruce Bannister Republican 93%
SC State House 34 Mike Forrester Republican 93%
SC State House 41 MaryGail Douglas Democratic 93%
SC State House 53 Richie Yow Republican 0%
SC State House 54 Pat Henegan Democratic 0%
SC State House 58 Jeff Johnson Republican 0%
SC State House 59 Terry Alexander Democratic 36%
SC State House 64 Robert Ridgeway III Democratic 71%
SC State House 90 Justin Bamberg Democratic 0%
SC State House 96 Kit Spires Republican 93%
SC State House 98 Chris Murphy Republican 93%
SC State House 104 Greg Duckworth Republican 0%
SC State House 122 Bill Bowers Democratic 93%
Justin Alexander 71%
Brian Alston 0%
Don Bowen 93%
Curtis Brantley 0%
Amy Brown 93%
Grady Brown 71%
Chris Cannon 0%
Mark Cathcart 86%
Joshua Cook 0%
Christopher Corley 0%
Dennis DiSabato 86%
Tracy Edge 93%
Perry Finch 86%
Kenneth Fipps 0%
Jeffrey Garland 86%
Russell Guerard 86%
Evan Guthrie 0%
Bang Hall 0%
Ed Harris 86%
Gaye Holt 0%
Jenny Horne 93%
R. Johnson 0%
William Killian 0%
Chip Limehouse III 100%
Steve Mauriello 86%
Walton McLeod III 43%
Adam Mestres 0%
Greg Ohanesian 0%
Alexis Pipkins, Sr. 0%
Mike Ryhal 79%
Monnie Singleton 0%
Franklin Smith 0%
Harley Staton 86%
Richard Tate 0%
Fred Thomas 0%
Gary Titcomb 86%
David Tribble, Jr. 86%
Rick Turnbull 0%
Valerie Wade 0%
Anthony Waymyers 0%
S. Weaver 0%
Michelle Wiles 86%
Vannie Williams, Jr. 0%
Heather Wood 86%
Donna Wood Hicks 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top