Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Planned Parenthood Voters of Nebraska

2013 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
NE State Senate 1 Dan Watermeier Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 8 Burke Harr Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 9 Sara Howard Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 10 Bob Krist Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 11 Ernie Chambers Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 14 Jim Smith Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 16 Lydia Brasch Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 19 Jim Scheer Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 22 Paul Schumacher Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 26 Matt Hansen Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 29 Kate Bolz Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 31 Rick Kolowski Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 40 Tyson Larson Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 45 Sue Crawford Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 49 John Murante Non-partisan 100%
NE Auditor of Public Accounts Charlie Janssen Republican 0%
NE Commissioner 1 Bill Avery 100%
Gregory Adams 100%
Brad Ashford 100%
Dave Bloomfield 0%
Kathy Campbell 100%
Tom Carlson 100%
Mark Christensen 0%
Colby Coash 100%
Danielle Conrad 100%
Tanya Cook 100%
Al Davis 100%
Annette Dubas 100%
Mike Gloor 100%
Ken Haar 100%
Galen Hadley 100%
John Harms 50%
Jerry Johnson 100%
Russ Karpisek 100%
Bill Kintner 0%
Steve Lathrop 100%
Scott Lautenbaugh 100%
Amanda McGill 100%
Heath Mello 100%
John Nelson 0%
Jeremy Nordquist 100%
Scott Price 0%
Ken Schilz 100%
Les Seiler 100%
Kate Sullivan 100%
Norman Wallman 100%
John Wightman 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top