Rating Group: The Family Foundation of Virginia

2006-2007 Positions

Issues: Conservative
State Office Name Party Rating
VA U.S. House-1 Rob Wittman R 100%
VA U.S. House-4 Donald McEachin D 20%
VA U.S. House-9 Morgan Griffith R 95%
VA State House-1 Terry Kilgore R 95%
VA State House-14 Danny Marshall III R 100%
VA State House-15 Todd Gilbert R 100%
VA State House-22 Kathy Byron R 100%
VA State House-24 Benjamin Cline R 100%
VA State House-25 Steve Landes R 100%
VA State House-36 Ken Plum D 5%
VA State House-37 David Bulova D 35%
VA State House-39 Vivian Watts D 15%
VA State House-40 Tim Hugo R 94%
VA State House-43 Mark Sickles D 11%
VA State House-54 Bobby Orrock, Sr. R 100%
VA State House-57 David Toscano D 5%
VA State House-58 Robert Bell III R 100%
VA State House-61 Thomas Wright, Jr. R 100%
VA State House-62 Riley Ingram R 95%
VA State House-65 Lee Ware, Jr. R 90%
VA State House-66 Kirk Cox R 100%
VA State House-75 Roslyn Tyler D 21%
VA State House-76 Chris Jones R 95%
VA State House-88 Mark Cole R 100%
VA State House-92 Jeion Ward D 0%
VA State House-97 Chris Peace R 100%
VA State Senate-2 Mamie Locke D 0%
VA State Senate-3 Thomas Norment, Jr. R 67%
VA State Senate-4 Ryan McDougle R 91%
VA State Senate-5 Lionell Spruill, Sr. D 6%
VA State Senate-6 Lynwood Lewis, Jr. D 60%
VA State Senate-7 Frank Wagner R 77%
VA State Senate-9 Jennifer McClellan D 10%
VA State Senate-14 John Cosgrove, Jr. R 100%
VA State Senate-15 Frank Ruff, Jr. R 84%
VA State Senate-16 Rosalyn Dance D 45%
VA State Senate-18 Louise Lucas D 11%
VA State Senate-21 John Edwards D 6%
VA State Senate-23 Stephen Newman R 100%
VA State Senate-24 Emmett Hanger, Jr. R 86%
VA State Senate-25 Creigh Deeds D 8%
VA State Senate-26 Mark Obenshain R 92%
VA State Senate-30 Adam Ebbin D 5%
VA State Senate-32 Janet Howell D 11%
VA State Senate-35 Dick Saslaw D 5%
VA State Senate-37 David Marsden D 20%
VA State Senate-40 Charles Carrico, Sr. R 95%
VA Attorney General Mark Herring D 23%
VA Mayor-At-Large Kenny Alexander D 55%
VA Mayor-At-Large Dwight Jones 13%
Watkins Abbitt, Jr. 100%
David Albo 94%
Kristen Amundson 10%
Ward Armstrong 60%
Clifford Athey, Jr. 100%
Mamye BaCote 5%
William Barlow 40%
J. Brandon Bell II 89%
Harry Blevins 72%
Daniel Bowling 50%
Robert Brink 0%
Vince Callahan, Jr. 89%
Charles Caputo 25%
John Chichester 64%
Charles Colgan, Sr. 62%
Anne Crockett-Stark 95%
Ken Cuccinelli II 92%
Jeannemarie Devolites Davis 64%
Allen Wayne Dudley 100%
Albert Eisenberg 0%
David Englin 5%
William Fralin, Jr. 100%
Jeffrey Frederick 100%
Thomas Gear 90%
Franklin Hall 20%
Phillip Hamilton 90%
Frank Hargrove, Sr. 94%
Charles Hawkins 71%
Clarke Hogan 95%
Edd Houck 45%
Algie Howell, Jr. 58%
William Howell 100%
Robert Hull 15%
Robert Hurt 100%
Salvatore Iaquinto 100%
Bill Janis 95%
Johnny Joannou 60%
Joseph Johnson, Jr. 100%
Benjamin Joseph Lambert III 16%
Scott Lingamfelter 95%
Matthew Lohr 100%
Henry Marsh III 15%
Bob Marshall 100%
Stephen Martin 100%
Joe May 95%
Michéle McQuigg 100%
Kenneth Melvin 6%
Jackson Miller 100%
Paula Miller 55%
Yvonne Miller 14%
Brian Moran 30%
Harvey Morgan 85%
Samuel Nixon, Jr. 100%
Dave Nutter 89%
John O'Bannon III 100%
James O'Brien, Jr. 85%
Glenn Oder 100%
Clarence Phillips 75%
David Poisson 15%
Harry Potts, Jr. 42%
Phillip Puckett 62%
Toddy Puller 15%
Bob Purkey 95%
Lacey Putney 95%
Frederick Quayle 63%
Melanie Rapp 100%
John Spence Reid 90%
D. Nick Rerras 82%
William Reynolds 62%
Thomas Rust 89%
Christopher Saxman 100%
Edward Scott 100%
James Scott 5%
Stephen Shannon 20%
Beverly Sherwood 100%
James Shuler 10%
Kenneth Stolle 67%
Walter Stosch 73%
Terrie Suit 95%
Robert Tata 100%
Patricia Ticer 15%
Shannon Valentine 60%
Katherine Waddell 30%
William Wampler, Jr. 73%
Leo Wardrup, Jr. 90%
Onzlee Ware 39%
John Watkins 64%
John Welch III 100%
Mary Margaret Whipple 6%
Martin Williams 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »