Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The Family Foundation of Virginia

2001 Positions

Issues: Conservative
State Office District Name Party Rating
VA U.S. House 9 Morgan Griffith Republican 89%
VA State House 1 Terry Kilgore Republican 83%
VA State House 13 Bob Marshall Republican 94%
VA State House 22 Kathy Byron Republican 94%
VA State House 25 Steve Landes Republican 88%
VA State House 28 William Howell Republican 76%
VA State House 36 Ken Plum Democratic 0%
VA State House 39 Vivian Watts Democratic 11%
VA State House 42 David Albo Republican 63%
VA State House 54 Bobby Orrock, Sr. Republican 65%
VA State House 61 Thomas Wright, Jr. Republican 80%
VA State House 62 Riley Ingram Republican 53%
VA State House 65 Lee Ware, Jr. Republican 94%
VA State House 66 Kirk Cox Republican 95%
VA State House 73 John O'Bannon III Republican 70%
VA State House 76 Chris Jones Republican 74%
VA State Senate 3 Thomas Norment, Jr. Republican 76%
VA State Senate 7 Lionell Spruill, Sr. Democratic 38%
VA State Senate 7 Frank Wagner Republican 43%
VA State Senate 13 Richard Hayden Black Republican 94%
VA State Senate 15 Frank Ruff, Jr. Republican 50%
VA State Senate 18 Louise Lucas Democratic 25%
VA State Senate 21 John Edwards Democratic 11%
VA State Senate 23 Stephen Newman Republican 100%
VA State Senate 24 Emmett Hanger, Jr. Republican 80%
VA State Senate 32 Janet Howell Democratic 11%
VA State Senate 35 Dick Saslaw Democratic 21%
VA Justice of the Supreme Court Bill Mims 78%
VA Mayor At-Large Dwight Jones 35%
VA State Board of Education James Dillard II 17%
Watkins Abbitt, Jr. 59%
James Frederick Almand 6%
Kristen Amundson 17%
Ward Armstrong 53%
William Barlow 33%
Warren Barry 38%
Viola Osborne Baskerville 0%
Robert Bloxom 19%
Bill Bolling 93%
Thomas Bolvin 50%
Robert Brink 0%
George Broman Jr. 77%
L. Bryant, Jr. 82%
Leslie Byrne 33%
Vince Callahan, Jr. 67%
John Chichester 43%
Mary Taylor Christian 0%
Charles Colgan, Sr. 43%
J. Paul Councill, Jr. 60%
Flora Davis Crittenden 22%
L. Karen Darner 0%
Jeannemarie Devolites Davis 78%
Thelma Drake 84%
Allen Wayne Dudley 76%
Franklin Hall 35%
Phillip Hamilton 53%
Frank Hargrove, Sr. 72%
Charles Hawkins 50%
Edd Houck 20%
Robert Hull 12%
Johnny Joannou 47%
Joseph Johnson, Jr. 61%
Jerrauld Jones 17%
W.B. Keister 38%
Benjamin Joseph Lambert III 19%
Allen Louderback 85%
Henry Marsh III 21%
Stephen Martin 100%
Madison Ellis Marye 29%
W. Henry Maxwell 42%
Joe May 61%
Bob McDonnell 94%
Michéle McQuigg 83%
Kenneth Melvin 18%
Kevin Grey Miller 64%
Yvonne Miller 29%
Brian Moran 22%
Harvey Morgan 47%
Samuel Nixon, Jr. 100%
James O'Brien, Jr. 84%
Harry Parrish 53%
Clarence Phillips 44%
Albert Pollard, Jr. 54%
Harry Potts, Jr. 60%
Phillip Puckett 57%
Toddy Puller 8%
Bob Purkey 59%
Lacey Putney 82%
Frederick Quayle 65%
Melanie Rapp 91%
John Spence Reid 79%
D. Nick Rerras 75%
William Reynolds 28%
John Adams Rollison III 56%
James Scott 6%
Beverly Sherwood 78%
James Shuler 31%
Kenneth Stolle 71%
Walter Stosch 79%
Jackie Thomas Stump 50%
Terrie Suit 86%
Robert Tata 56%
Alfred Victor Thomas 80%
Patricia Ticer 7%
Malfourd Trumbo 47%
Marian Amelia Van Landingham 17%
Mitchell Van Yahres 6%
William Wampler, Jr. 64%
Leo Wardrup, Jr. 69%
John Watkins 53%
Glenn Weatherholtz 78%
John Welch III 100%
Mary Margaret Whipple 13%
S. Vance Wilkins, Jr. 76%
Martin Williams 75%
Clifton Alexander Woodrum 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top