Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: United States Border Control

2003-2004 Positions

Issues: Immigration
State Office District Name Party Rating
Lincoln Davis 50%
Thomas Davis III 20%
Bill Delahunt 0%
Thomas DeLay 80%
James DeMint 80%
Peter Deutsch 10%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 30%
Norm Dicks 0%
John Dingell 20%
Calvin Dooley 0%
John Doolittle 100%
David Dreier 10%
Jennifer Dunn 50%
Chet Edwards 10%
Vern Ehlers 10%
Jo Ann Emerson 80%
Philip English 50%
Bob Etheridge 20%
Lane Evans 0%
Terry Everett 90%
Sam Farr 0%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 0%
Tom Feeney 100%
Michael Ferguson 40%
Bob Filner 0%
Mark Foley 80%
Randy Forbes 90%
Harold Ford, Jr. 10%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 70%
Barney Frank 0%
Trent Franks 100%
Jonas Frost III 10%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Scott Garrett 100%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 0%
Jim Gerlach 60%
Jim Gibbons 90%
Wayne Gilchrest 40%
Paul Gillmor 50%
Phil Gingrey 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 0%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 100%
Bart Gordon 50%
Porter Goss 60%
Mark Green 80%
James Greenwood 60%
Gilbert Gutknecht 90%
Ralph Hall 60%
Jane Harman 0%
Katherine Harris 70%
Melissa Hart 50%
Doc Hastings 40%
Robert Hayes 100%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 80%
Joel Hefley 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 90%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 25%
Baron Hill 20%
Maurice Hinchey 0%
Rubén Hinojosa, Sr. 0%
David Lee Hobson 50%
Joseph Hoeffel 0%
Pete Hoekstra 90%
Tim Holden 40%
Rush Holt, Jr. 0%
Mike Honda 0%
Darlene Hooley 50%
John Nathan Hostettler 100%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 30%
Kenny Hulshof 80%
Duncan Hunter 100%
Henry Hyde 50%
Steve Israel 20%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 80%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 0%
William Jefferson 0%
William Lewis Jenkins 90%
Christopher John 30%
Nancy Johnson 60%
Tim Johnson 60%
Paul Kanjorski 0%
Richard Keller 100%
Sue Kelly 90%
Mark Kennedy 70%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Dale Kildee 0%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 0%
Jack Kingston 90%
Mark Kirk 60%
Gerald Kleczka 0%
John Kline 80%
Joseph Knollenberg 40%
James Kolbe 30%
Dennis Kucinich 0%
Ray LaHood 40%
Nicholas Lampson 10%
Tom Lantos 0%
Tom Latham 50%
Steve LaTourette 50%
James Leach 20%
Jerry Lewis 40%
Ron Lewis 80%
John Linder 60%
William Lipinski 40%
Ken Lucas 30%
Denise Majette 10%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Marshall 60%
Jim Matheson 60%
Robert Matsui 0%
Carolyn McCarthy 0%
Karen McCarthy 0%
Thaddeus McCotter 90%
James McCrery III 80%
Jim McDermott 0%
John McHugh 80%
Mike McIntyre 60%
Buck McKeon 70%
Michael McNulty 0%
Martin Meehan 0%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 0%
John Mica 100%
Mike Michaud 0%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 0%
Candice Miller 80%
Gary Miller 100%
George Miller 0%
Jeff Miller 90%
Brad Miller 0%
Alan Mollohan 0%
Dennis Moore 20%
Jim Moran, Jr. 0%
Tim Murphy 70%
Jack Murtha 0%
Marilyn Musgrave 100%
Sue Myrick 100%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 40%
Randy Neugebauer 89%
Robert William Ney 60%
Anne Northup 60%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 90%
James Nussle 50%
Jim Oberstar 0%
Dave Obey 0%
John Olver 0%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 0%
Thomas William Osborne 40%
Doug Ose 40%
Major Owens 0%
Michael Oxley 40%
Ed Pastor 0%
Ron Paul 70%
Donald Payne 0%
John Peterson 70%
Tom Petri 90%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 60%
Joe Pitts 100%
Todd Platts 100%
Richard Pombo 80%
Earl Pomeroy 30%
Jon Porter, Sr. 30%
Deborah Pryce 20%
Adam Putnam 70%
Jack Quinn 50%
George Radanovich 60%
Nick Rahall II 0%
James Ramstad 100%
Charlie Rangel 0%
Ralph Regula 50%
Denny Rehberg 100%
Richard Renzi 70%
Silvestre Reyes 0%
Thomas Reynolds 60%
Ciro Rodriguez 0%
Mike Rogers 70%
Mike Ross 20%
Steve Rothman 0%
Jim Ryun 90%
Martin Olav Sabo 0%
Loretta Sanchez 0%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 10%
Jim Saxton 60%
Edward Schrock 80%
John Shadegg 90%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 60%
Christopher Shays 90%
Donald Sherwood 40%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 50%
Ike Skelton 30%
Louise Slaughter 0%
Nick Smith 70%
Vic Snyder 0%
Mark Souder 50%
John Spratt, Jr. 30%
Pete Stark 0%
Cliff Stearns 100%
Charles Stenholm 40%
Ted Strickland 10%
Bart Stupak 0%
John Sullivan 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top