Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Association for College Admission Counseling

2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 50%
Rodney Alexander 50%
Wayne Allard 0%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Spencer Bachus 40%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 66%
Brian Baird 100%
Richard Hugh Baker 50%
J. Gresham Barrett 33%
John Barrow 100%
Roscoe Bartlett 33%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 100%
Melissa Bean 100%
Bob Bennett 66%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 100%
Joe Biden, Jr. 100%
Judy Biggert 50%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Tim Bishop 100%
John Boehner 33%
Kit Bond 0%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 33%
Mary Bono Mack 33%
Dan Boren 83%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 100%
Charles Boustany, Jr. 50%
Barbara Boxer 100%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 100%
Corrine Brown 100%
Henry Brown, Jr. 50%
Ginny Brown-Waite 33%
Jim Bunning 0%
Dan Burton 33%
Steve Buyer 50%
Robert Byrd 100%
Dave Camp 50%
John Campbell III 50%
Chris Cannon 33%
Eric Cantor 33%
Lois Capps 100%
Dennis Cardoza 100%
Russ Carnahan 100%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 50%
Saxby Chambliss 0%
Ben Chandler III 100%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 33%
Thomas Coburn 0%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 100%
John Conyers, Jr. 100%
Jerry Costello 100%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 83%
Ander Crenshaw 33%
Barbara Cubin 33%
Artur Davis 100%
Geoff Davis 50%
Jo Ann Davis 50%
Lincoln Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 50%
Bill Delahunt 100%
James DeMint 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 50%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Chris Dodd 100%
Elizabeth Dole 66%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 66%
John Doolittle 33%
Byron Dorgan 100%
Thelma Drake 50%
David Dreier 33%
Chet Edwards 66%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Jo Ann Emerson 50%
Philip English 50%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Terry Everett 50%
Sam Farr 100%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 100%
Tom Feeney 50%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 50%
Bob Filner 100%
Randy Forbes 50%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 50%
Barney Frank 100%
Trent Franks 0%
Elton Gallegly 50%
Scott Garrett 50%
Jim Gerlach 83%
Wayne Gilchrest 0%
Paul Gillmor 33%
Phil Gingrey 33%
Charlie Gonzalez 83%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 50%
Bart Gordon 100%
Judd Gregg 0%
Charles Hagel 66%
Ralph Hall 33%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 33%
Robert Hayes 50%
Wally Herger, Jr. 33%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 100%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
Rubén Hinojosa, Sr. 83%
David Lee Hobson 50%
Pete Hoekstra 50%
Tim Holden 100%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Mike Honda 100%
Darlene Hooley 100%
Kenny Hulshof 50%
Duncan Hunter 50%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 50%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Steve Israel 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 100%
Bobby Jindal 50%
Tim Johnson 83%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 100%
Richard Keller 33%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
John Kerry 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jack Kingston 33%
Mark Kirk 50%
John Kline 33%
Joseph Knollenberg 33%
Herb Kohl 100%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
John Kuhl, Jr. 50%
Jon Kyl 0%
Ray LaHood 50%
Mary Landrieu 100%
Tom Lantos 100%
Tom Latham 50%
Steve LaTourette 66%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 50%
Ron Lewis 50%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 50%
Trent Lott, Sr. 66%
Dick Lugar 66%
Dan Lungren 33%
Connie Mack IV 33%
Don Manzullo 50%
Jim Marshall 100%
Melquiades Martinez 0%
Jim Matheson 100%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 50%
James McCrery III 50%
Jim McDermott 100%
John McHugh 83%
Mike McIntyre 100%
Buck McKeon 50%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 100%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 83%
John Mica 50%
Mike Michaud 100%
Barbara Mikulski 100%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Candice Miller 50%
Gary Miller 40%
George Miller 100%
Jeff Miller 0%
Brad Miller 100%
Alan Mollohan 100%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 100%
Tim Murphy 50%
Jack Murtha 100%
Marilyn Musgrave 0%
Sue Myrick 33%
Ben Nelson 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top