Rating Group: North Dakota AFL-CIO

2005 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
ND State House-3 Andrew Maragos R 66%
ND State House-8 Jeff Delzer R 26%
ND State House-9 Tracy Boe D-NPL 100%
ND State House-10 Charles Damschen R 21%
ND State House-10 David Monson R 26%
ND State House-13 Kim Koppelman R 27%
ND State House-14 Jon Nelson R 35%
ND State House-14 Robin Weisz R 27%
ND State House-15 Dennis Johnson R 26%
ND State House-17 Mark Owens R 37%
ND State House-23 Bill Devlin R 26%
ND State House-23 Don Vigesaa R 26%
ND State House-27 Randy Boehning R 21%
ND State House-28 Michael Don Brandenburg R 27%
ND State House-29 Craig Headland R 26%
ND State House-29 Chet Pollert R 26%
ND State House-32 Lisa Meier R 36%
ND State House-33 Gary Kreidt R 27%
ND State House-34 Todd Porter R 25%
ND State House-35 Bob Martinson R 36%
ND State House-38 Larry Bellew R 26%
ND State House-38 Dan Ruby R 21%
ND State House-39 Keith Kempenich R 22%
ND State House-40 Randy Schobinger R 59%
ND State House-41 Al Carlson R 21%
ND State House-43 Lois Delmore D-NPL 100%
ND State House-46 James Kasper R 26%
ND State House-47 George Keiser R 33%
ND State House-47 Lawrence Klemin R 26%
ND State Senate-11 Tim Mathern D-NPL 100%
ND State Senate-13 Judy Lee R 47%
ND State Senate-14 Jerry Klein R 50%
ND State Senate-17 Ray Holmberg R 47%
ND State Senate-21 Carolyn Nelson D-NPL 93%
ND State Senate-22 Gary Lee R 47%
ND State Senate-24 Larry Robinson D-NPL 85%
ND State Senate-28 Robert Erbele R 50%
ND State Senate-32 Dick Dever R 54%
ND State Senate-34 Dwight Cook R 54%
ND State Senate-37 Rich Wardner R 47%
ND State Senate-39 Bill Bowman R 39%
ND State Senate-40 Karen Krebsbach R 47%
ND State Senate-47 Ralph Kilzer R 47%
ND Commissioner-At-Large Merle Boucher 100%
Ole Aarsvold 100%
Bill Amerman 100%
John Andrist 47%
Wesley Belter 27%
Dennis Bercier 93%
Rick Berg 27%
LeRoy Bernstein 23%
Richard Brown 47%
Thomas Brusegaard 27%
Ron Carlisle 31%
Dawn Marie Charging 31%
Randel Christmann 54%
Donald Clark 27%
Kari Lee Conrad 100%
Stacey Dahl 26%
Duane Lee DeKrey 22%
Donald Dietrich 33%
Mark Dosch 29%
David Drovdal 26%
Mary Ekstrom 100%
Duaine Espegard 54%
Michael Every 93%
April Fairfield 92%
Tom Fischer 59%
Tim Flakoll 47%
Layton Freborg 47%
Rod Froelich 100%
Glen Froseth 26%
Pat Galvin 42%
Eliot Glassheim 100%
Bette Grande 26%
Tony Grindberg 42%
Pam Gulleson 100%
C.B. Haas 26%
Nick Hacker 47%
Lyle Hanson 95%
Kathy Hawken 38%
Joel Curtis Heitkamp 93%
Gil Herbel 26%
Bob Hunskor 100%
Ron Iverson 26%
Nancy Johnson 33%
Lee Kaldor 95%
RaeAnn Kelsch 27%
Scot Kelsh 100%
James Kerzman 100%
Joyce Kingsbury 21%
Matthew Klein 27%
Aaron Krauter 92%
William Kretschmar 42%
Edroy Kringstad 50%
Joe Kroeber 100%
Elroy Lindaas 85%
Stanley Lyson 47%
Ralph Metcalf 95%
Shirley Meyer 89%
Phillip Mueller 95%
Duane Mutch 47%
Dave Nething 63%
Eugene Nicholas 27%
Mike Norland 27%
Darrell Nottestad 31%
David O'Connell 92%
Kenton Onstad 100%
Vonnie Pietsch 26%
Louise Potter 84%
Clara Sue Price 22%
Earl Rennerfeldt 23%
Sally Sandvig 95%
Arlo Schmidt 100%
Tom Seymour 93%
Margaret Sitte 36%
Robert Skarphol 26%
Dorvan Solberg 100%
Bob Stenehjem 50%
Ken Svedjan 25%
John Syverson 62%
Harvey Tallackson 77%
Ryan Taylor 93%
Russell Thane 47%
Blair Thoreson 26%
Elwood Thorpe 100%
Mike Timm 22%
Ben Tollefson 47%
John Traynor 50%
Thomas Trenbeath 47%
Constance Triplett 85%
Gerald Uglem 26%
Herbert Urlacher 47%
Francis Wald 22%
John Wall 37%
John Warner 93%
Dave Weiler 37%
Alon Wieland 26%
Clark Williams 81%
Dwight Wrangham 26%
Steven Zaiser 84%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.