Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: California League of Conservation Voters

2010 Lifetime Score

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo 94%
CA State Senate 1 Ted Gaines Republican 3%
CA Supervisor 1 Kevin Jeffries 10%
CA U.S. House 2 Jared Huffman Democratic 100%
CA Council Member 3 Bob Blumenfield 98%
CA Supervisor 4 Curt Hagman 8%
CA State Senate 4 Jim Nielsen Republican 8%
CA State Senate 5 Cathleen Galgiani Democratic 43%
CA Supervisor 5 Joe Simitian No Party Affiliation 98%
CA Council Member 7 Felipe Fuentes 85%
CA State Senate 8 Tom Berryhill Republican 6%
CA U.S. House 8 Paul Cook Republican 10%
CA Council Member 9 Curren Price, Jr. 91%
CA State Senate 9 Nancy Skinner Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 10 Jeff Denham Republican 8%
CA U.S. House 11 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic 98%
CA State Senate 13 Gerald Hill Democratic 98%
CA State Senate 15 Jim Beall, Jr. Democratic 99%
CA State Senate 16 Jean Fuller Republican 9%
CA State Senate 17 Bill Monning Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 24 Kevin de Leon Democratic 95%
CA U.S. House 25 Steve Knight Republican 3%
CA State Senate 25 Anthony Portantino, Jr. Democratic 91%
CA U.S. House 26 Julia Brownley Democratic 100%
CA State Assembly 30 Anna Caballero Democratic 83%
CA State Senate 32 Tony Mendoza Democratic 86%
CA U.S. House 33 Ted Lieu Democratic 96%
CA State Senate 35 Steven Bradford Democratic 94%
CA U.S. House 35 Norma Torres Democratic 74%
CA U.S. House 37 Karen Bass Democratic 97%
CA State Senate 38 Joel Anderson Republican 6%
CA U.S. House 45 Mimi Walters Republican 3%
CA U.S. House 46 Lou Correa Democratic 56%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 96%
CA Council Member Ward 3 Jose Solorio 84%
CA Mayor At-Large Mary Salas 98%
CA Mayor At-Large Darrell Steinberg Democratic 97%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla Democratic 93%
CA State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Non-partisan 96%
Samuel Aanestad 5%
Anthony Adams 15%
Alfred Ernest Alquist 96%
Tom Ammiano 100%
Juan Arambula 80%
Roy Ashburn 4%
Bill Berryhill 15%
Sam Blakeslee 24%
Martin Block 92%
Joan Buchanan 95%
Charles Calderon 76%
Ron Calderon 70%
Amina Carter 91%
Wesley Chesbro 98%
David Cogdill 4%
Connie Conway 7%
Ellen Corbett 99%
Joe Coto 90%
Dave Cox 7%
Mike Davis 90%
Hector De La Torre 90%
Charles DeVore 3%
Denise Ducheny 82%
Robert Dutton 5%
Bill Emmerson 10%
Mike Eng 98%
Noreen Evans 98%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 26%
Dean Florez 63%
Paul Fong 93%
Frank Fortino 13%
Warren Furutani 87%
Martin Garrick 5%
Mike Gatto 100%
Danny Gilmore 19%
Isadore Hall III 81%
Loni Hancock 99%
Diane Harkey 12%
Tom Harman 18%
Mary Hayashi 97%
Roger Hernandez 88%
Dennis Hollingsworth 2%
Alyson Huber 46%
Robert Huff 5%
Brian Jones 98%
Christine Kehoe 96%
Mark Leno 100%
Carol Liu 93%
Dan Logue 8%
Bonnie Lowenthal 100%
Fiona Ma 95%
Jeff Miller 5%
Pedro Nava 98%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 70%
Brian Nestande 12%
Roger Niello 6%
Chris Norby 5%
Jenny Oropeza 87%
Fran Pavley 100%
John Pérez 69%
Manuel Pérez 96%
Gloria Romero 95%
George Runner, Jr. 4%
Ira Ruskin 99%
Lori Saldaña 100%
Jim Silva 6%
Cameron Smyth 15%
Tony Strickland 5%
Audra Strickland 8%
Sandré Swanson 95%
Alberto Torrico 82%
Van Tran 8%
Mike Villines 6%
Patricia Wiggins 99%
Lois Wolk 89%
Roderick Wright 76%
Mark Wyland 4%
Mariko Yamada 98%
Leland Yee 91%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top