Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: South Carolina Sierra Club

1994-1995 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
SC U.S. House 2 Joe Wilson, Sr. Republican 60%
SC State House 2 William Sandifer III Republican 15%
SC State House 36 Rita Allison Republican 9%
SC State House 43 Greg Delleney, Jr. Republican 45%
SC State House 46 Gary Simrill Republican 38%
SC State House 66 Gilda Cobb-Hunter Democratic 100%
SC State House 69 Richard Quinn, Jr. Republican 25%
SC State House 76 Leon Howard Democratic 100%
SC State House 82 William Clyburn, Sr. Democratic 75%
SC State House 95 Jerry Govan, Jr. Democratic 90%
SC State House 113 Seth Whipper Democratic 92%
SC State Senate 1 Thomas Alexander Republican 20%
SC State Senate 2 Rex Rice Republican 8%
SC State Senate 11 Glenn Reese Democratic 60%
SC State Senate 14 Harvey Peeler, Jr. Republican 33%
SC State Senate 16 Greg Gregory Republican 86%
SC State Senate 19 John Scott, Jr. Democratic 91%
SC State Senate 20 John Courson Republican 67%
SC State Senate 21 Darrell Jackson Democratic 86%
SC State Senate 26 Nikki Setzler Democratic 22%
SC State Senate 31 Hugh Leatherman, Sr. Republican 0%
SC State Senate 33 Luke Rankin, Sr. Republican 44%
SC State Senate 39 John Matthews, Jr. Democratic 56%
SC Council Member 3 George Bailey Republican 18%
SC Superintendent of Education Molly Spearman Republican 54%
Harry Raymond Askins 40%
John Michael Baxley 67%
William Daniel Boan 45%
Floyd Breeland 100%
Grady Brown 64%
Henry Brown, Jr. 9%
Joe Brown 80%
Theodore Brown 100%
Alma Weaver Byrd 100%
Ralph Canty 100%
Marion Pinckney Carnell 11%
Harry Cato 0%
Wilbur Lucius Cave 33%
Daniel Cooper 17%
Holly Ann Cork 100%
Charles Tyrone Courtney 38%
James Mann Cromer, Jr. 77%
Thomas Dantzler 8%
Guy Davenport, Jr. 9%
John Drummond 17%
Michael Easterday 0%
Dick Elliott 78%
John Felder 20%
Ronald Fleming 8%
Robert Ford 71%
Dr. Margaret Gamble 0%
Warren Kenneth Giese 38%
Maggie Wallace Glover 75%
Robert Harrell, Jr. 23%
James Harrison 20%
Charles Alexander Harvin III 9%
Terry Edward Haskins 17%
Wes Hayes, Jr. 71%
Mack Hines, Jr. 73%
Donald Harry Holland 0%
Curtis Inabinett 100%
Douglas Jennings, Jr. 54%
Mark Stephen Kelley 0%
Kenneth Kennedy 73%
Marion Hardy Kinon 18%
Herbert Kirsh 67%
James Klauber 10%
Jake Knotts, Jr. 8%
Larry Labruce Koon 8%
John Land III 20%
James Lander 20%
Stephen Lanford, Sr. 17%
James Norris Law 10%
Phil Leventis 100%
Chip Limehouse III 8%
Lanny Littlejohn 15%
Walter Lloyd 100%
Larry Martin 20%
Rudolph Marion Mason 8%
Jennings Gary McAbee 10%
Glenn McConnell 50%
E. DeWitt McCraw 8%
John McGill 10%
Woodrow Maxie 'Woody McKay 12%
Willie McMahand, Sr. 88%
William Mescher 30%
Bessie Moody-Lawrence 100%
Tommy Moore 29%
Joseph Neal 100%
Denny Neilson 50%
William O'Dell 22%
Ernest Leroy Passailaigue, Jr. 78%
Kay Patterson 50%
Olin Phillips 18%
Thomas Rhoad 30%
Becky Richardson 25%
John Riser 8%
Alfred Burgess Robinson, Jr. 0%
John Richardson Russell 57%
Greg Ryberg 22%
Edward Saleeby 33%
Lynn Seithel 42%
Charles Ray Sharpe 8%
Robert Joseph Sheheen 69%
Linda Short 100%
Roland Smith 8%
Jefferson Verne Smith 17%
William Smith 0%
Harry Carl Stille 33%
Eugene Creighton Stoddard 0%
Elsie Rast Stuart 10%
David Thomas 22%
Ronald Parker Townsend 25%
Daniel Tripp 0%
Teddy Norman Trotter 8%
Lewis Raymond Vaughn 0%
Bob Waldrep, Jr. 44%
Robert Walker 0%
Mickinley Washington, Jr. 44%
Michael Stewart Whatley 20%
Donny Wilder 46%
Timothy Castles Wilkes 44%
David Horton Wilkins 15%
William Witherspoon 8%
Annette Young 8%
William Jeffrey Young 40%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top