Rating Group: Wisconsin AFL-CIO

2009-2010 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 100%
WI U.S. House-6 Glenn Grothman R 9%
WI State Assembly-6 Gary Tauchen R 0%
WI State Assembly-9 Josh Zepnick D 100%
WI State Assembly-11 Jason Fields D 100%
WI State Assembly-12 Frederick Kessler D 100%
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 100%
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 100%
WI State Assembly-23 Jim Ott R 0%
WI State Assembly-24 Dan Knodl R 0%
WI State Assembly-36 Jeffrey Mursau R 0%
WI State Assembly-38 Joel Kleefisch R 0%
WI State Assembly-40 Kevin Petersen R 0%
WI State Assembly-41 Joan Ballweg R 0%
WI State Assembly-42 Keith Ripp R 22%
WI State Assembly-46 Gary Hebl D 100%
WI State Assembly-50 Ed Brooks R 0%
WI State Assembly-54 Gordon Hintz D 100%
WI State Assembly-61 Samantha Kerkman R 0%
WI State Assembly-63 Robin Vos R 0%
WI State Assembly-64 Peter Barca D 100%
WI State Assembly-66 Cory Mason D 100%
WI State Assembly-73 Nick Milroy D 100%
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 100%
WI State Assembly-80 Sondy Pope D 100%
WI State Assembly-89 John Nygren R 0%
WI State Assembly-96 Lee Nerison R 11%
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 18%
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 100%
WI State Senate-4 Lena Taylor D 100%
WI State Senate-5 Leah Vukmir R 11%
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 18%
WI State Senate-11 Stephen Nass R 0%
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 9%
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 9%
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 100%
WI State Senate-19 Roger Roth, Jr. R 0%
WI State Senate-22 Bob Wirch D 100%
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 100%
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 100%
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 11%
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 100%
WI State Senate-31 Kathleen Vinehout D 100%
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 100%
WI Supervisor-17 Tony Staskunas 100%
Chuck Benedict 100%
Penny Bernard Schaber 100%
Garey Bies 13%
Spencer Black 100%
Fred Clark 100%
G. Spencer Coggs 100%
Pedro Colon 89%
David Cullen 100%
Chris Danou 100%
Brett Davis 11%
Russell Decker 100%
Kristen Dexter 100%
Michael Ellis 18%
Jeff Fitzgerald 0%
Donald Friske 25%
Phil Garthwaite 100%
Mark Gottlieb 0%
Tamara Grigsby 100%
Scott Gunderson 0%
Mark Gundrum 0%
Sheila Harsdorf 18%
Steve Hilgenberg 100%
Kim Hixson 100%
Jim Holperin 100%
Mark Honadel 0%
Randy Hopper 18%
Ann Hraychuck 100%
Mary Hubler 89%
Michael Huebsch 0%
Robert Jauch 100%
Andy Jorgensen 100%
Theodore Kanavas 9%
Dan Kapanke 18%
Dean Kaufert 33%
Neal Kedzie 11%
Steven Kestell 0%
Bill Kramer 11%
Pat Kreitlow 100%
Margaret Krusick 89%
Alan Lasee 9%
Julie Lassa 100%
Mary Lazich 9%
John Lehman 100%
Joseph Leibham 9%
Daniel LeMahieu 0%
Thomas Lothian 11%
Dan Meyer 0%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 100%
Phil Montgomery 0%
John Murtha 0%
Tom Nelson 100%
Scott Newcomer 0%
Alvin Ott 22%
Joseph Parisi 100%
Sandra Pasch 100%
Jeffrey Plale 100%
Don Pridemore 0%
Mark Radcliffe 89%
Kitty Rhoades 0%
Jon Richards 100%
Judith Robson 100%
Kelda Roys 100%
Marlin Schneider 100%
Dale Schultz 18%
Donna Seidel 100%
Mike Sheridan 100%
Gary Sherman 100%
Jeffrey Smith 100%
James Soletski 100%
Richard Spanbauer 25%
John Steinbrink 100%
Jeffrey Stone 0%
Pat Strachota 0%
Scott Suder 0%
Jim Sullivan 91%
Barbara Toles 100%
John Townsend 11%
Robert Turner 100%
Terry Van Akkeren 100%
Karl Van Roy 0%
Amy Vruwink 100%
Annette Williams 86%
Mary Williams 11%
Jeffrey Wood 88%
Robert Ziegelbauer 11%
Ted Zigmunt 100%
Rich Zipperer 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.