Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Missouri National Education Association

2002 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
MO U.S. House 3 Blaine Luetkemeyer Republican 46%
MO Alderman Ward 11 Thomas Villa 100%
Mark Abel 100%
Frank Barnitz 92%
Carl Bearden 50%
Robert Behnen 50%
Lanie Black III 65%
Craig Bland 100%
Amber Boykins 100%
Sharon Sanders Brooks 100%
Richard Byrd 27%
Marsha Campbell 92%
Russ Carnahan 100%
Shannon Cooper 52%
Larry Crawford 58%
Jason Crowell 50%
Jane Cunningham 50%
Melba Curls 100%
Michael Daus 92%
Dahlman Davis 100%
Tom Dempsey 55%
Kathlyn Fares 73%
Barbara Fraser 100%
Thomas George 100%
Charles Graham 100%
Thomas Green 85%
Mark Hampton 100%
Catherine Hanaway 42%
Esther Hill Haywood 100%
Robert Hilgemann 100%
Roy Holand 69%
Steve Hunter 8%
Rodney Jetton 23%
Connie Johnson 100%
Richard Johnson 91%
Cathy Jolly 100%
Gary Kelly 90%
Van Kelly 58%
Jerry King 50%
Maurice Lawson 100%
Albert Joseph Liese 100%
Jenee Lowe 92%
B. J. Marsh 73%
Bob May 42%
Robert Mayer 50%
Ryan McKenna 100%
Ronnie Miller 50%
Danielle Moore 69%
Peter Myers, Jr. 50%
Susan Phillips 50%
Charles Portwood 42%
Chuck Purgason 46%
John Quinn 50%
Bill Ransdall 100%
Rex Rector 38%
Annie Reinhart 58%
Bradley Roark 8%
James Seigfreid 100%
Harold Selby 100%
Chris Shoemaker 42%
Wes Shoemyer 100%
Trent Skaggs 100%
Neal St. Onge 73%
Betty Thompson 100%
Merrill Townley 21%
Wes Wagner 100%
Vicki Walker 100%
Juanita Walton 100%
Dan Ward 100%
James Whorton 85%
Philip Willoughby 100%
Vicky Riback Wilson 92%
Yvonne Wilson 100%
Mark Wright 17%
Robin Wright-Jones 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top