Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Grass Roots North Carolina

2000 Positions

Issues: Guns
State Office District Name Party Rating
NC U.S. House 5 Virginia Foxx Republican 100%
NC U.S. House 12 Alma Adams Democratic 0%
NC State House 31 Mickey Michaux, Jr. Democratic 0%
NC State House 56 Verla Insko Democratic 0%
NC State House 79 Julia Howard Republican 100%
NC State House 89 Mitchell Setzer Republican 100%
NC State House 101 Beverly Earle Democratic 0%
NC State Senate 14 Dan Blue, Jr. Democratic 0%
Charles Albertson 67%
Martha Alexander 0%
Gordon Philip Allen 100%
Austin Allran 100%
Cary Allred 100%
Gene Gray Arnold 90%
Philip Augustine Baddour, Jr. 75%
Rex Baker 100%
Frank Ballance, Jr. 22%
Patrick Ballantine 100%
Bobby Harold Barbee, Sr. 100%
Daniel Barefoot 100%
Marc Basnight 67%
James Black 88%
Donald Allen Bonner 40%
Joanne Bowie 100%
Flossie Boyd-McIntyre 18%
John Douglas Bridgeman 100%
Harold Brubaker 100%
Charles Franklin Buchanan 100%
Lanier Cansler 100%
J. Russell Capps 100%
Robert Carpenter 100%
John Carrington 100%
Walter Church, Sr. 80%
Debbie Clary 100%
Nelson Cole 80%
A. Leslie Cox, Jr. 50%
James Crawford, Jr. 100%
Billy James Creech 100%
Arlie Franklin Culp, Jr. 100%
William Thomas Culpepper III 82%
William Pete Cunningham 20%
Walter Dalton 33%
Charlie Dannelly 0%
Leo Daughtry 100%
Donald Spencer Davis 100%
Michael Decker, Sr. 100%
Andrew Thomas Dedmon 100%
Jerry Dockham 100%
Ruth Easterling 18%
Rick Louis Eddins 100%
Zeno Edwards, Jr. 100%
James Samuel Ellis 90%
Theresa Harlow Esposito 100%
Milton Fitch, Jr. 10%
James Forrester 100%
Stanley Harold Fox 70%
Charlotte Ancher Gardner 91%
John Garwood 100%
Pryor Gibson III 100%
Mitch Gillespie 100%
Wayne Goodwin 40%
William Grady 100%
Lyons Gray 100%
Jim Gulley 100%
Wilbur Gulley 13%
Joe Hackney 0%
Robert Phillip Haire 50%
Fletcher Hartsell, Jr. 100%
Robert Jonathan Hensley, Jr. 0%
William Seth Hiatt 100%
Dewey Hill 100%
George Milton Holmes 100%
William James Horn 100%
Hamilton Horton, Jr. 100%
David Hoyle, Sr. 78%
Howard Hunter, Jr. 30%
John Hurley 73%
Mary Jarrell 25%
Margaret Jeffus 0%
Luther Henry Jordan, Jr. 67%
Larry Thomas Justus 100%
John Kerr III 75%
Eleanor Kinnaird 0%
Joe Kiser 91%
Howard Nathaniel Lee 33%
Jeanne Hopkins Lucas 13%
Paul Luebke 0%
Robert Martin 63%
William Martin 0%
Mary McAllister 11%
Daniel McComas 100%
Willard Eugene McCombs 100%
Marian McLawhorn 100%
William Edwin McMahan 100%
Olin Max Melton 100%
Brad Miller 33%
David Morris Miner 100%
William Franklin Mitchell 100%
Richard Morgan 100%
Amelia Morris 100%
Martin Nesbitt, Jr. 75%
Edd Nye 73%
Thomas LaFontine Odom, Sr. 67%
Warren Claude Oldham 25%
William Owens, Jr. 100%
Aaron Plyler 67%
James Pope 100%
Jean Preston 100%
Anthony Rand 63%
John Melvin Rayfield 100%
David Redwine 80%
Eric Miller Reeves 33%
Richard Eugene Rogers 60%
Robert Rucho 100%
Carolyn Barnes Russell 100%
Drew Saunders 0%
Paul Wayne Sexton, Sr. 100%
Larry Shaw 50%
Robert Shaw 100%
Wilma Sherrill 100%
Ronald Smith 75%
Robert Soles, Jr. 63%
Edgar Starnes 100%
Ronnie Sutton 33%
W. B. Teague, Jr. 100%
Gregory James Thompson 100%
Joe Tolson 89%
Russell Tucker 100%
William Wainwright 88%
Trudi Walend 100%
Edward 'Alexander Warner, Jr. 78%
Edith Warren 100%
Edward Warren 78%
Nurham Osbie Warwick 100%
Hugh Webster 100%
David Weinstein 60%
Jennifer Weiss 0%
Allen Wellons 33%
Constance Wilson 100%
William Eugene Wilson 100%
Larry Womble 0%
Stephen Wray Wood 100%
Thomas Wright 20%
Douglas Yongue 64%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top