Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Leading Age

2003 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Joe Pitts 50%
Todd Platts 50%
Richard Pombo 50%
Earl Pomeroy 100%
Jon Porter, Sr. 50%
Deborah Pryce 50%
Mark Pryor 89%
Adam Putnam 50%
George Radanovich 50%
Nick Rahall II 0%
James Ramstad 100%
Charlie Rangel 50%
Ralph Regula 50%
Denny Rehberg 50%
Harry Reid 89%
Richard Renzi 50%
Silvestre Reyes 50%
Thomas Reynolds 50%
Jay Rockefeller IV 89%
Mike Rogers 50%
Mike Ross 50%
Steve Rothman 50%
Jim Ryun 50%
Martin Olav Sabo 50%
Loretta Sanchez 50%
Rick Santorum 33%
Paul Sarbanes 89%
Jim Saxton 50%
John Shadegg 50%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 50%
Christopher Shays 50%
Donald Sherwood 50%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 50%
Ike Skelton 50%
Gordon Smith 56%
Olympia Snowe 67%
Vic Snyder 50%
Mark Souder 50%
Arlen Specter 67%
John Spratt, Jr. 50%
Pete Stark 50%
Cliff Stearns 50%
Ted Stevens 44%
Ted Strickland 50%
Bart Stupak 0%
John Sullivan 50%
John Sununu 33%
John Sweeney 50%
James Talent 44%
Tom Tancredo 100%
John Tanner 50%
Ellen Tauscher 50%
Charles Taylor 50%
Gene Taylor 100%
Lee Terry 0%
Craig Thomas 22%
William Thomas 50%
Todd Tiahrt 50%
John Tierney 50%
Ed Towns 50%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 50%
Mark Udall 50%
David Vitter 50%
George Voinovich 67%
James Walsh 50%
Zach Wamp 50%
John Warner 44%
Diane Watson 50%
Mel Watt 50%
Henry Waxman 50%
Anthony Weiner 50%
David Weldon 50%
W. Curtis Weldon 50%
Gerald Weller 50%
Robert Wexler 50%
Ed Whitfield 50%
Heather Wilson 100%
Frank Wolf 50%
Lynn Woolsey 50%
David Wu 50%
Albert Wynn 50%
Bill Young 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top