Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Alaska National Federation of Independent Business

2005-2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
AK State House 4 David Guttenberg Democratic 33%
AK State House 8 Mark Neuman Republican 100%
AK State House 15 Gabrielle LeDoux Republican 67%
AK State House 20 Les Gara Democratic 33%
AK State House 29 Mike Chenault Republican 100%
AK State House 31 Paul Seaton Republican 80%
AK State Senate B John Coghill, Jr. Republican 100%
AK State Senate I Berta Gardner Democratic 33%
AK State Senate M Kevin Meyer Republican 100%
AK State Senate P Gary Stevens Republican 100%
AK State Senate R Bert Stedman Republican 100%
AK State Senate S Lyman Hoffman Democratic 100%
AK State Senate T Donald Olson Democratic 86%
AK Mayor At-Large Ethan Berkowitz Democratic 33%
AK Mayor At-Large Reggie Joule 33%
AK Assembly Member 3 Eric Croft No Party Affiliation 33%
AK Assembly Member At-Large Eric Croft No Party Affiliation 33%
Tom Anderson 100%
Con Bunde 100%
Sharon Cissna 67%
John Cowdery 100%
Harry Crawford, Jr. 33%
Nancy Dahlstrom 50%
Bettye Davis 60%
Fred Dyson 100%
James Elkins 100%
Johnny Ellis 57%
Kim Elton 43%
Richard Foster 100%
Hollis French II 43%
Carl Gatto 100%
Lyda Green 100%
Max Gruenberg, Jr. 33%
Gretchen Guess 43%
John Harris 100%
Mike Hawker 100%
James Holm 100%
Charlie Huggins 100%
Mike Kelly 100%
Beth Kerttula 20%
Vic Kohring 100%
Albert Kookesh 57%
Pete Kott 80%
Bob Lynn 67%
Lesil McGuire 100%
Carl Moses 83%
Mary Nelson 33%
Kurt Olson 100%
Jay Ramras 100%
Norman Rokeberg 100%
Woodie Salmon 20%
Ralph Samuels 100%
Ralph Seekins 100%
Ben Stevens 100%
Bill Stoltze 100%
Gene Therriault 100%
Bill Thomas, Jr. 100%
Thomas Wagoner 100%
Bruce Weyhrauch 83%
Gary Wilken 100%
Peggy Wilson 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top