Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Life Priority Network

2011 Positions (Congressional House Only)

Issues: Abortion
State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 42 Ken Calvert Republican 100%
John Campbell III 100%
CA U.S. House 10 Jeff Denham Republican 100%
David Dreier 100%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
CA U.S. House 50 Duncan Hunter Republican 100%
CA U.S. House 49 Darrell Issa Republican 100%
Jerry Lewis 100%
Dan Lungren 100%
CA U.S. House 23 Kevin McCarthy Republican 100%
CA U.S. House 4 Tom McClintock Republican 100%
Buck McKeon 100%
Gary Miller 100%
CA U.S. House 22 Devin Nunes Republican 100%
CA U.S. House 48 Dana Rohrabacher Republican 100%
CA U.S. House 39 Ed Royce Republican 100%
Brian Bilbray 50%
Joe Baca, Sr. 0%
CA U.S. House 37 Karen Bass Democratic 0%
CA Attorney General Xavier Becerra Democratic 0%
Howard Berman 0%
Mary Bono Mack 0%
Lois Capps 0%
Dennis Cardoza 0%
CA U.S. House 27 Judy Chu Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 16 Jim Costa Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 53 Susan Davis Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 18 Anna Eshoo Democratic 0%
Sam Farr 0%
Bob Filner 0%
CA U.S. House 3 John Garamendi Democratic 0%
Jane Harman 0%
Mike Honda 0%
CA U.S. House 13 Barbara Lee Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 19 Zoe Lofgren Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 6 Doris Matsui Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 9 Jerry McNerney Democratic 0%
George Miller 0%
CA U.S. House 32 Grace Napolitano Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 12 Nancy Pelosi Democratic 0%
Laura Richardson 0%
CA U.S. House 40 Lucille Roybal-Allard Democratic 0%
Loretta Sanchez 0%
CA U.S. House 38 Linda Sánchez Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 28 Adam Schiff Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 30 Brad Sherman Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 14 Jackie Speier Democratic 0%
Pete Stark 0%
CA U.S. House 5 Mike Thompson Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 43 Maxine Waters Democratic 0%
Henry Waxman 0%
Lynn Woolsey 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top