Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Ready Mixed Concrete Association

1999-2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
John Peterson 60%
Tom Petri 60%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 60%
Joe Pitts 40%
Todd Platts 60%
Richard Pombo 60%
Earl Pomeroy 20%
Jon Porter, Sr. 60%
Deborah Pryce 60%
Mark Pryor 20%
Adam Putnam 60%
George Radanovich 40%
Nick Rahall II 40%
James Ramstad 60%
Charlie Rangel 20%
Ralph Regula 40%
Denny Rehberg 80%
Harry Reid 40%
Richard Renzi 40%
Silvestre Reyes 0%
Thomas Reynolds 60%
Jay Rockefeller IV 40%
Mike Rogers 60%
Mike Ross 20%
Steve Rothman 20%
Jim Ryun 40%
Martin Olav Sabo 0%
Loretta Sanchez 20%
Rick Santorum 40%
Paul Sarbanes 40%
Jim Saxton 40%
John Shadegg 40%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 60%
Christopher Shays 40%
Donald Sherwood 60%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 60%
Ike Skelton 20%
Gordon Smith 80%
Olympia Snowe 60%
Vic Snyder 0%
Mark Souder 60%
Arlen Specter 20%
John Spratt, Jr. 20%
Pete Stark 0%
Cliff Stearns 40%
Ted Stevens 60%
Ted Strickland 20%
Bart Stupak 20%
John Sullivan 80%
John Sununu 60%
John Sweeney 40%
James Talent 100%
Tom Tancredo 60%
John Tanner 20%
Ellen Tauscher 20%
Charles Taylor 40%
Gene Taylor 40%
Lee Terry 100%
Craig Thomas 100%
William Thomas 60%
Todd Tiahrt 40%
John Tierney 0%
Ed Towns 20%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 20%
Mark Udall 0%
David Vitter 60%
George Voinovich 100%
James Walsh 40%
Zach Wamp 60%
John Warner 100%
Diane Watson 0%
Mel Watt 0%
Henry Waxman 0%
Anthony Weiner 20%
David Weldon 60%
W. Curtis Weldon 40%
Gerald Weller 40%
Robert Wexler 0%
Ed Whitfield 60%
Heather Wilson 60%
Frank Wolf 40%
Lynn Woolsey 0%
David Wu 20%
Albert Wynn 20%
Bill Young 40%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top