Rating Group: Virginia Society for Human Life

1978-1999 Lifetime Score

Issues: Abortion
State Office Name Party Rating
VA U.S. House-4 Donald McEachin D 75%
VA U.S. House-9 Morgan Griffith R 90%
VA State House-1 Terry Kilgore R 100%
VA State House-13 Bob Marshall R 100%
VA State House-22 Kathy Byron R 100%
VA State House-25 Steve Landes R 100%
VA State House-28 William Howell R 100%
VA State House-36 Ken Plum D 0%
VA State House-39 Vivian Watts D 11%
VA State House-42 David Albo R 86%
VA State House-54 Bobby Orrock, Sr. R 100%
VA State House-62 Riley Ingram R 96%
VA State House-65 Lee Ware, Jr. R 100%
VA State House-66 Kirk Cox R 100%
VA State House-76 Chris Jones R 100%
VA State Senate-3 Thomas Norment, Jr. R 100%
VA State Senate-5 Lionell Spruill, Sr. D 21%
VA State Senate-7 Frank Wagner R 100%
VA State Senate-13 Richard Hayden Black R 100%
VA State Senate-15 Frank Ruff, Jr. R 95%
VA State Senate-18 Louise Lucas D 11%
VA State Senate-21 John Edwards D 0%
VA State Senate-23 Stephen Newman R 100%
VA State Senate-24 Emmett Hanger, Jr. R 13%
VA State Senate-25 Creigh Deeds D 35%
VA State Senate-32 Janet Howell D 0%
VA State Senate-35 Dick Saslaw D 12%
VA Justice of the Supreme Court Bill Mims 100%
VA Mayor-At-Large Dwight Jones 15%
VA State Board of Education James Dillard II 29%
Watkins Abbitt, Jr. 56%
James Frederick Almand 0%
Ward Armstrong 61%
William Barlow 48%
Warren Barry 69%
Viola Osborne Baskerville 0%
William Welden Bennett, Jr. 73%
Harry Blevins 100%
Robert Bloxom 50%
Bill Bolling 100%
Robert Brink 0%
L. Bryant, Jr. 100%
Vince Callahan, Jr. 97%
Eric Cantor 96%
John Chichester 88%
Mary Taylor Christian 7%
Whittington Whiteside Clement 85%
Charles Colgan, Sr. 100%
J. Paul Councill, Jr. 55%
Emily Couric 0%
Charles Cranwell 42%
Flora Davis Crittenden 14%
Glenn Croshaw 44%
L. Karen Darner 0%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Barnie Day 93%
Jay Wayne DeBoer 19%
Jeannemarie Devolites Davis 100%
Alan Arnold Diamonstein 50%
Vivian Earl Dickinson 81%
Thelma Drake 100%
Allen Wayne Dudley 95%
Randy Forbes 100%
George Wallace Grayson 3%
Franklin Hall 53%
Phillip Hamilton 96%
Frank Hargrove, Sr. 90%
Paul Clinton Harris, Sr. 100%
Charles Hawkins 93%
Richard Joyner Holland 80%
Edd Houck 17%
Robert Hull 14%
Thomas Micajah Jackson, Jr. 62%
Johnny Joannou 27%
Joseph Johnson, Jr. 96%
Jerrauld Jones 0%
Jay Kenneth Katzen 95%
Gladys Brown Keating 22%
Benjamin Joseph Lambert III 83%
Henry Marsh III 0%
Stephen Martin 100%
Madison Ellis Marye 0%
W. Henry Maxwell 67%
Joe May 100%
Roger John McClure 100%
Bob McDonnell 100%
Michéle McQuigg 100%
Kenneth Melvin 8%
Kevin Grey Miller 100%
Yvonne Miller 18%
Brian Moran 20%
Harvey Morgan 81%
Thomas Warren Moss, Jr. 34%
Samuel Nixon, Jr. 100%
James O'Brien, Jr. 100%
Harry Parrish 97%
Clarence Phillips 72%
Harry Potts, Jr. 100%
Bob Purkey 89%
Lacey Putney 97%
Frederick Quayle 100%
John Spence Reid 96%
William Reynolds 100%
Anne Gregory Rhodes 9%
William Peters Robinson, Jr. 3%
John Adams Rollison III 93%
John Howson Rust, Jr. 88%
Edward Schrock 100%
James Scott 4%
Beverly Sherwood 81%
James Shuler 20%
Kenneth Stolle 100%
Walter Stosch 100%
Jackie Thomas Stump 75%
Robert Tata 100%
John Harvey Tate, Jr. 75%
Alfred Victor Thomas 97%
Patricia Ticer 0%
Malfourd Trumbo 88%
Marian Amelia Van Landingham 0%
Mitchell Van Yahres 19%
Stanley Clay Walker 12%
William Wampler, Jr. 100%
Leo Wardrup, Jr. 91%
John Watkins 70%
Glenn Weatherholtz 100%
Mary Margaret Whipple 0%
S. Vance Wilkins, Jr. 100%
Donald Williams 25%
Martin Williams 100%
Clifton Alexander Woodrum 10%
Jane Haycock Woods 44%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.