Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Citizens for Global Solutions

2012 Global Issues Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 100%
Sandy Adams 0%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 92%
Todd Akin 0%
Rodney Alexander 33%
Jason Altmire 42%
Rob Andrews 75%
Steve Austria 33%
Kelly Ayotte 0%
Joe Baca, Sr. 75%
Michele Bachmann 0%
Spencer Bachus 17%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 0%
John Barrow 58%
Roscoe Bartlett 17%
Charlie Bass 50%
Max Baucus 92%
Mark Begich 75%
Dan Benishek 0%
Rick Berg 33%
Shelley Berkley 67%
Howard Berman 100%
Judy Biggert 33%
Brian Bilbray 33%
Michael Bilirakis 17%
Jeff Bingaman 92%
Tim Bishop 75%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 33%
Mary Bono Mack 33%
Dan Boren 17%
Leonard Boswell 92%
Charles Boustany, Jr. 17%
Barbara Boxer 100%
Bruce Braley 75%
Paul Broun 0%
Corrine Brown 92%
Scott Brown 33%
Ann Marie Buerkle 0%
Dan Burton 0%
Dave Camp 17%
John Campbell III 0%
Francisco Canseco 17%
Eric Cantor 33%
Lois Capps 92%
Dennis Cardoza 67%
Russ Carnahan 100%
Jason Chaffetz 0%
Saxby Chambliss 0%
Ben Chandler III 58%
Hansen Clarke 75%
Dan Coats 0%
Howard Coble 0%
Thomas Coburn 8%
Kent Conrad 83%
Jerry Costello 50%
Chip Cravaack 17%
Ander Crenshaw 33%
Mark Critz 50%
Geoff Davis 42%
James DeMint 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 17%
Norm Dicks 92%
John Dingell 75%
Bob Dold 33%
David Dreier 42%
Donna Edwards 92%
Renee Ellmers 17%
Jo Ann Emerson 0%
Sam Farr 100%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 92%
Bob Filner 92%
Stephen Fincher 0%
Mike Fitzpatrick 17%
John Fleming, Jr. 0%
Randy Forbes 17%
Barney Frank 92%
Elton Gallegly 17%
Scott Garrett 0%
Jim Gerlach 17%
Chris Gibson 33%
Phil Gingrey 0%
Charlie Gonzalez 75%
Michael Grimm 67%
Frank Guinta 0%
Kay Hagan 83%
Ralph Hall 17%
Richard Hanna 33%
Tom Harkin 92%
Doc Hastings 0%
Nan Hayworth 33%
Joe Heck, Jr. 17%
Wally Herger, Jr. 17%
Maurice Hinchey 92%
Rubén Hinojosa, Sr. 92%
Thomas Holden 67%
Rush Holt, Jr. 83%
Mike Honda 83%
Tim Huelskamp 17%
Duncan Hunter 17%
Robert Hurt 0%
Daniel Inouye 75%
Steve Israel 75%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 75%
Mike Johanns 17%
Timothy Johnson 92%
Tim Johnson 0%
John Kerry 92%
Dale Kildee 92%
Jack Kingston 17%
Mark Kirk 42%
Larry Kissell 58%
John Kline 17%
Herb Kohl 92%
Dennis Kucinich 67%
Jon Kyl 0%
Mary Landrieu 42%
Tom Latham 0%
Steve LaTourette 42%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Carl Levin 75%
Jerry Lewis 42%
Joe Lieberman 75%
Dick Lugar 58%
Cynthia Lummis 0%
Dan Lungren 33%
Connie Mack IV 0%
Don Manzullo 0%
Jim Matheson 50%
Carolyn McCarthy 75%
Thaddeus McCotter 17%
Jim McDermott 100%
Mike McIntyre 42%
Buck McKeon 33%
John Mica 17%
Mike Michaud 75%
Barbara Mikulski 92%
Candice Miller 0%
Gary Miller 17%
George Miller 92%
Jeff Miller 0%
Brad Miller 92%
Jim Moran, Jr. 92%
Sue Myrick 8%
Ben Nelson 42%
Randy Neugebauer 17%
Rich Nugent 0%
Alan Nunnelee 33%
John Olver 92%
Bill Owens 75%
Ed Pastor 75%
Ron Paul 8%
Tom Petri 0%
Joe Pitts 0%
Todd Platts 17%
Mike Pompeo 17%
Mark Pryor 67%
Ben Quayle 42%
Nick Rahall II 67%
Charlie Rangel 100%
Denny Rehberg 17%
Harry Reid 92%
Silvestre Reyes 92%
Reid Ribble 0%
Laura Richardson 83%
Scott Rigell 0%
David Rivera 17%
Jay Rockefeller IV 92%
Mike Rogers 17%
Mike Ross 42%
Steve Rothman 75%
Jon Runyan 17%
Loretta Sanchez 75%
Bobby Schilling 0%
Jean Schmidt 0%
Aaron Schock 42%
Allyson Schwartz 75%
Heath Shuler 50%
Olympia Snowe 33%
Steve Southerland 0%
Pete Stark 58%
Cliff Stearns 0%
Marlin Stutzman 0%
John Sullivan 0%
Betty Sutton 92%
Lee Terry 0%
John Tierney 92%
Ed Towns 92%
Mark Udall 100%
David Vitter 0%
Joe Walsh 0%
Mel Watt 92%
Henry Waxman 92%
Jim Webb, Jr. 92%
Allen West 0%
Lynn Westmoreland 0%
Ed Whitfield 17%
Frank Wolf 42%
Lynn Woolsey 75%
Bill Young 8%
WI U.S. Senate Jr Tammy Baldwin Democratic 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top