Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Americans for Prosperity

2011-2012 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 5%
Sandy Adams 91%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 12%
Todd Akin 95%
Rodney Alexander 64%
Jason Altmire 18%
Rob Andrews 0%
Steve Austria 86%
Kelly Ayotte 89%
Joe Baca, Sr. 5%
Michele Bachmann 89%
Spencer Bachus 77%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 74%
Ron Barber 0%
John Barrow 36%
Roscoe Bartlett 91%
Charlie Bass 59%
Max Baucus 11%
Mark Begich 17%
Dan Benishek 77%
Rick Berg 77%
Shelley Berkley 5%
Howard Berman 5%
Judy Biggert 67%
Brian Bilbray 64%
Michael Bilirakis 80%
Jeff Bingaman 9%
Tim Bishop 9%
John Boehner 67%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 68%
Mary Bono Mack 68%
Dan Boren 50%
Leonard Boswell 14%
Charles Boustany, Jr. 82%
Barbara Boxer 9%
Bruce Braley 5%
Paul Broun 95%
Corrine Brown 10%
Scott Brown 43%
Ann Marie Buerkle 90%
Dan Burton 95%
Dave Camp 64%
John Campbell III 95%
Francisco Canseco 77%
Eric Cantor 73%
Lois Capps 5%
Dennis Cardoza 5%
Russ Carnahan 5%
Jason Chaffetz 95%
Saxby Chambliss 74%
Ben Chandler III 18%
Hansen Clarke 9%
Dan Coats 86%
Howard Coble 85%
Thomas Coburn 94%
Kent Conrad 3%
John Conyers, Jr. 9%
Jerry Costello 14%
Chip Cravaack 73%
Ander Crenshaw 64%
Mark Critz 18%
David Curson 0%
Geoff Davis 75%
James DeMint 97%
Norm Dicks 5%
John Dingell 5%
Bob Dold 59%
David Dreier 64%
Donna Edwards 5%
Renee Ellmers 73%
Jo Ann Emerson 68%
John Ensign 75%
Sam Farr 5%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 0%
Bob Filner 0%
Stephen Fincher 82%
Mike Fitzpatrick 64%
John Fleming, Jr. 95%
Randy Forbes 73%
Barney Frank 9%
Trent Franks 100%
Elton Gallegly 73%
Scott Garrett 100%
Jim Gerlach 64%
Chris Gibson 50%
Gabrielle Giffords 0%
Phil Gingrey 91%
Henry Gonzalez 5%
Michael Grimm 59%
Frank Guinta 86%
Kay Hagan 11%
CA Supervisor 4 Janice Hahn 17%
Ralph Hall 82%
Richard Hanna 59%
Tom Harkin 11%
Jane Harman 0%
Doc Hastings 68%
Nan Hayworth 68%
Joe Heck, Jr. 68%
Wally Herger, Jr. 90%
Maurice Hinchey 6%
Rubén Hinojosa, Sr. 11%
Tim Holden 32%
Rush Holt, Jr. 5%
Mike Honda 5%
Tim Huelskamp 95%
Robert Hurt 86%
Daniel Inouye 9%
Steve Israel 5%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 0%
Mike Johanns 77%
Timothy Johnson 3%
Tim Johnson 62%
Walter Jones, Sr. 68%
John Kerry 9%
Jack Kingston 77%
Mark Kirk 83%
Larry Kissell 14%
John Kline 68%
Herb Kohl 9%
Dennis Kucinich 19%
Jon Kyl 89%
Mary Landrieu 23%
Tom Latham 73%
Steve LaTourette 55%
Frank Lautenberg 13%
Chris Lee 67%
Carl Levin 6%
Jerry Lewis 67%
Joe Lieberman 12%
William Lipinski 9%
Dick Lugar 71%
Cynthia Lummis 95%
Dan Lungren 64%
Connie Mack IV 95%
Don Manzullo 86%
Jim Matheson 41%
Robert Matsui 5%
Carolyn McCarthy 10%
Thaddeus McCotter 81%
Jim McDermott 9%
Mike McIntyre 45%
Buck McKeon 67%
John Mica 77%
Mike Michaud 5%
Barbara Mikulski 11%
Candice Miller 73%
Gary Miller 86%
George Miller 5%
Jeff Miller 91%
Brad Miller 9%
Jim Moran, Jr. 5%
Frank Murkowski 69%
Austin Murphy 77%
Sue Myrick 90%
Ben Nelson 23%
Randy Neugebauer 100%
Rich Nugent 86%
Alan Nunnelee 81%
John Olver 5%
Major Owens 10%
Ed Pastor 5%
Ron Paul 85%
Donald Payne 0%
Tom Petri 77%
Joe Pitts 68%
Todd Platts 59%
Mike Pompeo 95%
Tom Price 91%
David Pryor 20%
Ben Quayle 100%
Nick Rahall II 9%
Charlie Rangel 5%
Denny Rehberg 64%
Harry Reid 9%
Silvestre Reyes 9%
Reid Ribble 91%
Laura Richardson 9%
Scott Rigell 77%
David Rivera 77%
Jay Rockefeller IV 6%
Mike Rogers 68%
Mike Ross 36%
Steve Rothman 5%
Jon Runyan 68%
Loretta Sanchez 5%
Bobby Schilling 77%
Jean Schmidt 90%
Aaron Schock 67%
Allyson Schwartz 0%
Heath Shuler 15%
E.G. Shuster 64%
Olympia Snowe 49%
Steve Southerland 95%
Pete Stark 15%
Cliff Stearns 91%
Marlin Stutzman 95%
John Sullivan 77%
Betty Sutton 9%
Lee Terry 86%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top