Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado State Shooting Association

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CO Commissioner 2 Liane McFadyen 88%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 88%
CO State Senate 11 Michael Merrifield Democratic 32%
CO State Senate 15 Kevin Lundberg Republican 88%
CO State House 16 Larry Liston Republican 80%
CO State Senate 20 Cheri Jahn Democratic 16%
CO State Senate 28 Nancy Todd Democratic 56%
Bob Bacon 0%
David Balmer 80%
Alice Borodkin 0%
Betty Boyd 0%
Greg Brophy 88%
Bernie Buescher 80%
Bill Cadman 88%
Terrance Carroll 0%
Lauri Clapp 100%
Mark Alan Cloer 80%
Fran Coleman 48%
Bill Crane 88%
Kathleen Curry 80%
Richard Decker 88%
F. Jim Dyer 100%
K. Jerry Frangas 0%
Michael Garcia 48%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon 0%
Peter Groff 0%
Bob Hagedorn 88%
Dale Hall 80%
Deanna Hanna 0%
Ted Harvey 88%
Lynn Christian Hefley 100%
Mary Hodge 0%
Diane Hoppe 88%
Joel Judd 0%
Matthew Knoedler 80%
Mark Larson 72%
Alice Madden 0%
Rosemary Marshall 0%
Thomas Massey, Jr. 80%
Michael May 88%
Ronny May 88%
Bob McCluskey, Jr. 48%
Andrew McElhany 88%
Wes McKinley 80%
Shawn Mitchell 88%
Angie Paccione 16%
Joshua Penry 80%
Tom Plant 0%
John Pommer 0%
Ann Ragsdale 0%
James Riesberg 16%
Andrew Romanoff 0%
Raymond Rose 100%
David Schultheis 88%
Judy Solano 32%
Nancy Spence 80%
Debbie Stafford 100%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 80%
James Sullivan 64%
Stephanie Takis 24%
Jack Taylor 88%
Ron Tupa 0%
Jennifer Veiga 0%
Valentin Vigil 0%
Paul Weissmann 0%
Albert White 100%
Tom Wiens 88%
Suzanne Williams 32%
Sue Windels 0%
John Witwer 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top