Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy

2008 Positions on Child and Youth Issues

State Office District Name Party Rating
OK Lieutenant Governor Todd Lamb Republican 80%
OK State House 6 Chuck Hoskin Democratic 80%
OK State House 11 Earl Sears Republican 100%
OK State House 14 George Faught Republican 90%
OK State House 15 Ed Cannaday Democratic 78%
OK State House 17 Brian Renegar Democratic 80%
OK State House 25 Todd Thomsen Republican 100%
OK State House 31 Jason Murphey Republican 70%
OK State House 41 John Enns Republican 100%
OK State House 46 Scott Martin Republican 100%
OK State House 74 Dale Derby Republican 90%
OK State House 77 Eric Proctor Democratic 90%
OK State House 79 Weldon Watson Republican 80%
OK State House 83 Randy McDaniel Republican 100%
OK State House 94 Scott Inman Democratic 100%
OK State Senate 16 John Sparks Democratic 100%
OK State Senate 24 Anthony Sykes Republican 60%
OK State Senate 32 Randy Bass Democratic 100%
OK State Senate 36 Bill Brown Republican 67%
OK State Senate 38 Mike Schulz Republican 90%
OK State Senate 48 Anastasia Pittman Democratic 78%
OK Commissioner 2 Mike Thompson 100%
OK Commissioner 3 Ron Peters 100%
OK Treasurer Ken Miller Republican 90%
Tom Adelson 100%
Dennis Adkins 100%
Cliff Aldridge 60%
Patrick Anderson 80%
Don Armes 100%
John Auffet 90%
Roger Ballenger 100%
Gary Banz 100%
Don Barrington 80%
Chris Benge 100%
Scott BigHorse 80%
Lisa Billy 100%
Brian Bingman 67%
Gus Blackwell 100%
David Braddock 100%
Cliff Branan 89%
Neil Brannon 100%
Randy Brogdon 70%
Mike Brown 90%
Sean Burrage 100%
John Wayne Carey 100%
Lance Cargill 100%
Harry Coates, Jr. 100%
Glenn Coffee 75%
Wallace Collins 90%
Ann Coody 100%
Marian Cooksey 100%
Kenneth Corn 100%
James Covey 90%
Doug Cox 100%
Brian Crain 80%
Johnnie Crutchfield 100%
David Dank 100%
Lee Denney 100%
Dale DeWitt 100%
Joe Dorman 100%
Rex Duncan 80%
Mary Easley 100%
Judy Eason McIntyre 100%
Jerry Ellis 89%
John Ford 90%
Earl Garrison 100%
Darrell Gilbert 90%
Larry Glenn 100%
Jay Paul Gumm 100%
Rebecca Hamilton 100%
Terry Harrison, Jr. 100%
Jeff Hickman 90%
Wes Hilliard 100%
Terry Hyman 100%
Terry Ingmire 87%
Tom Ivester 100%
Mike Jackson 100%
Shane Jett 100%
Constance Johnson 100%
Dennis Johnson 100%
Mike Johnson 90%
Rob Johnson 100%
Clark Jolley 80%
Tad Jones 100%
Fred Jordan 90%
Charles Joyner 100%
Ron Justice 70%
Sally Kern 100%
Charles Key 100%
Ryan Dean Kiesel 100%
Lucky Lamons 100%
Charlie Laster 100%
Owen Laughlin 90%
Debbe Leftwich 100%
Richard Lerblance 100%
Guy Liebmann 100%
Al Lindley 70%
Ken Luttrell 78%
Steve Martin 100%
Mike Mazzei 70%
Al McAffrey 90%
Raymond Gene McCarter 100%
Mark McCullough 100%
Jeannie McDaniel 90%
Ryan McMullen 80%
Skye McNiel 100%
Jerry McPeak 80%
Danny Morgan 100%
Mike Morgan 100%
Richard Morrissette 60%
David Myers 70%
Bill Nations 100%
Jonathan Nichols 100%
Susan Paddack 100%
Pam Peterson 90%
Ron Peterson 89%
Greg Piatt 90%
R. C. Pruett 100%
Jeff Rabon 80%
Jim Reynolds 88%
Mike Reynolds 70%
Andrew Rice 100%
Phil Richardson 100%
Nancy Riley 90%
Paul Roan 100%
Wade Rousselot 80%
Colby Schwartz 100%
TW Shannon 100%
Mike Shelton 63%
Ben Sherrer 100%
Jerry Shoemake 100%
Jabar Shumate 90%
Glen Bud Smithson 90%
Kris Steele 100%
Dan Sullivan 100%
Joe Loyd Sweeden 100%
Randy Terrill 100%
Sue Tibbs 100%
John Trebilcock 100%
Dale Turner 100%
Purcy Walker 100%
Paul Wesselhoft 88%
Kathleen Wilcoxson 67%
James Williamson 67%
Jim Wilson 100%
Susan Winchester 100%
Trebor Worthen 86%
John Wright 70%
Charles Wyrick 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top