Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy

2007 Positions on Child and Youth Issues

State Office District Name Party Rating
OK Lieutenant Governor Todd Lamb Republican 60%
OK State House 6 Chuck Hoskin Democratic 90%
OK State House 11 Earl Sears Republican 80%
OK State House 14 George Faught Republican 70%
OK State House 15 Ed Cannaday Democratic 89%
OK State House 17 Brian Renegar Democratic 90%
OK State House 25 Todd Thomsen Republican 70%
OK State House 31 Jason Murphey Republican 50%
OK State House 41 John Enns Republican 70%
OK State House 74 Dale Derby Republican 60%
OK State House 77 Eric Proctor Democratic 80%
OK State House 79 Weldon Watson Republican 80%
OK State House 83 Randy McDaniel Republican 70%
OK State House 94 Scott Inman Democratic 80%
OK State Senate 16 John Sparks Democratic 90%
OK State Senate 24 Anthony Sykes Republican 40%
OK State Senate 32 Randy Bass Democratic 90%
OK State Senate 36 Bill Brown Republican 70%
OK State Senate 38 Mike Schulz Republican 70%
OK State Senate 48 Anastasia Pittman Democratic 100%
OK Commissioner 2 Mike Thompson 78%
OK Commissioner 3 Ron Peters 80%
OK Treasurer Ken Miller Republican 70%
Tom Adelson 78%
Dennis Adkins 67%
Cliff Aldridge 50%
Patrick Anderson 70%
Don Armes 70%
John Auffet 80%
Roger Ballenger 90%
Gary Banz 67%
Don Barrington 80%
Chris Benge 75%
Scott BigHorse 100%
Lisa Billy 80%
Brian Bingman 80%
Gus Blackwell 67%
David Braddock 90%
Cliff Branan 70%
Neil Brannon 90%
Randy Brogdon 30%
Mike Brown 90%
Sean Burrage 90%
John Wayne Carey 100%
Lance Cargill 70%
Harry Coates, Jr. 88%
Glenn Coffee 40%
Wallace Collins 100%
Ann Coody 80%
Marian Cooksey 70%
Kenneth Corn 90%
James Covey 80%
Doug Cox 80%
Brian Crain 70%
Johnnie Crutchfield 90%
David Dank 70%
Lee Denney 80%
Dale DeWitt 70%
Joe Dorman 80%
Rex Duncan 60%
Mary Easley 90%
Judy Eason McIntyre 100%
Jerry Ellis 90%
John Ford 80%
Earl Garrison 90%
Darrell Gilbert 100%
Larry Glenn 70%
Jay Paul Gumm 80%
Rebecca Hamilton 90%
Terry Harrison, Jr. 75%
Jeff Hickman 70%
Wes Hilliard 80%
Terry Hyman 80%
Terry Ingmire 75%
Tom Ivester 70%
Mike Jackson 67%
Shane Jett 78%
Constance Johnson 100%
Dennis Johnson 70%
Mike Johnson 78%
Rob Johnson 50%
Clark Jolley 70%
Tad Jones 78%
Fred Jordan 70%
Charles Joyner 80%
Ron Justice 80%
Sally Kern 60%
Charles Key 60%
Ryan Dean Kiesel 90%
Lucky Lamons 80%
Charlie Laster 78%
Owen Laughlin 60%
Debbe Leftwich 90%
Richard Lerblance 100%
Guy Liebmann 67%
Al Lindley 100%
Ken Luttrell 80%
Scott Martin 80%
Steve Martin 80%
Mike Mazzei 78%
Al McAffrey 100%
Raymond Gene McCarter 90%
Mark McCullough 80%
Jeannie McDaniel 100%
Ryan McMullen 80%
Skye McNiel 80%
Jerry McPeak 80%
Danny Morgan 90%
Mike Morgan 83%
Richard Morrissette 78%
David Myers 67%
Bill Nations 89%
Jonathan Nichols 80%
Susan Paddack 80%
Pam Peterson 80%
Ron Peterson 80%
Greg Piatt 70%
R. C. Pruett 80%
Jeff Rabon 89%
Jim Reynolds 70%
Mike Reynolds 33%
Andrew Rice 90%
Phil Richardson 80%
Nancy Riley 80%
Paul Roan 100%
Wade Rousselot 90%
Colby Schwartz 70%
TW Shannon 70%
Mike Shelton 90%
Ben Sherrer 90%
Jerry Shoemake 90%
Jabar Shumate 88%
Glen Bud Smithson 90%
Kris Steele 80%
Dan Sullivan 78%
Joe Loyd Sweeden 89%
Randy Terrill 60%
Sue Tibbs 80%
John Trebilcock 67%
Dale Turner 90%
Purcy Walker 90%
Paul Wesselhoft 56%
Kathleen Wilcoxson 70%
James Williamson 60%
Jim Wilson 90%
Susan Winchester 78%
Trebor Worthen 50%
John Wright 60%
Charles Wyrick 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top