Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Vermont Conservation Voters

2001-2002 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
VT U.S. House At-Large Peter Welch Democratic 100%
VT Governor Phil Scott Republican 43%
VT Lieutenant Governor Dave Zuckerman Democratic 91%
VT State House Addison-5 Harvey Smith Republican 18%
VT State House Bennington-2-2 Mary Morrissey Republican 0%
VT State House Chittenden-4-2 Bill Lippert, Jr. Democratic 64%
VT State House Chittenden-6-5 Johannah Donovan Democratic 100%
VT State House Chittenden-7-2 Ann Pugh Democratic 64%
VT State House Chittenden-8-1 Linda Myers Republican 14%
VT State House Rutland-3 Robert Helm Republican 9%
VT State House Washington-4 Warren Kitzmiller Democratic 73%
VT State House Washington-7 Maxine Grad Democratic 64%
VT State House Windham-3 Carolyn Partridge Democratic 82%
VT State House Windsor-3-2 Alice Emmons Democratic 91%
VT State House Windsor-Orange-2 James Masland Democratic 100%
VT State Senate Bennington Richard Sears, Jr. Democratic 71%
VT State Senate Chittenden Ginny Lyons Democratic 100%
VT State Senate Essex-Orleans Robert Starr Democratic 27%
VT State Senate Grand Isle Dick Mazza Democratic 86%
VT State Senate Lamoille Richard Westman Republican 36%
VT State Senate Washington Ann Cummings Democratic 71%
VT State Senate Windsor Alice Nitka Democratic 73%
VT Secretary of State Jim Condos Democratic 100%
VT Mayor At-Large Robert Kiss 91%
VT Council Member Ward 4 Kurt Wright Republican 27%
VT Assistant Judge At-Large Jack Anderson 64%
Steven Adams 18%
David Allaire 0%
George Allard 18%
Edwin Amidon, Jr. 55%
William Aswad 82%
Kenneth Atkins 27%
Albert Audette 36%
Joseph Baker 18%
Susan Bartlett 100%
John Bloomer, Jr. 43%
Lynn Bohi 100%
David Bolduc 9%
Donald Bostic 27%
Francis Brooks 91%
David Brown 9%
John Campbell 100%
Julius Canns 43%
Erron Carey 0%
David Clark 0%
Kinny Connell 100%
Howard Crawford 0%
George Cross 55%
Judith Crowley 0%
Maureen Dakin 55%
Steve Darrow 100%
David Deen 82%
Thomas DePoy 9%
Robert Dostis 100%
Bill Doyle 43%
Virginia Duffy 0%
Kevin Endres 18%
Michael Fisher 82%
Peg Flory 18%
Avis Gervais 36%
Gerry Gossens 100%
Henry Gray 0%
James Greenwood 14%
Carl Haas 0%
John Kenneth Hall 9%
Martha Heath 82%
Steve Hingtgen 64%
Constance Houston 18%
Dick Howrigan, Sr. 18%
Richard Hube 27%
Cola Hudson 0%
Margaret Hummel 91%
Vincent Illuzzi 29%
William Johnson 18%
Michael Kainen 18%
Kathleen Keenan 73%
Sylvia Kennedy 9%
Bill Keogh 55%
Carroll Ketchum 18%
Duncan Kilmartin 0%
Linda Kirker 0%
Sara Kittell 57%
Thomas Koch 18%
Albert Krawczyk 0%
Leigh Larocque 18%
Steve Larrabee, Sr. 18%
Mark Larson 91%
James Leddy 100%
Judy Livingston 27%
Richard Marron 36%
Hull Maynard 29%
Frank Mazur 27%
Doran Metzger 18%
Virginia Milkey 91%
Alice Miller 91%
Lawrence Molloy 73%
Harry Monti 18%
Kevin Mullin 18%
Janet Munt 100%
Betty Nuovo 91%
Michael John Obuchowski 91%
Patricia O'Donnell 18%
Harvey Otterman, Jr. 9%
Janice Peaslee 0%
Daryl Pillsbury 36%
Michael Reese 73%
David Rogers 18%
Robert Rusten 73%
George Schiavone 9%
Ann Seibert 64%
Malcolm Severance 27%
Loren Shaw 9%
Nancy Sheltra 0%
Diane Snelling 100%
Donna Sweaney 91%
Gene Sweetser 9%
Gaye Symington 82%
Ruth Towne 0%
John Patrick Tracy 91%
Leo Valliere 18%
Val Vincent 73%
Perry Waite 18%
Stephen Webster 27%
John Winters 9%
Philip Winters 18%
Robert Wood, Jr. 18%
Mark Young 9%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top