Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Marijuana Policy Project

2015-2016 Positions (Nebraska State Legislature)

State Office District Name Party Rating
NE State Senate 1 Dan Watermeier Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 4 Bob Hilkemann Non-partisan 25%
NE State Senate 8 Burke Harr Non-partisan 75%
NE State Senate 9 Sara Howard Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 10 Bob Krist Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 11 Ernie Chambers Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 12 Merv Riepe Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 14 Jim Smith Non-partisan 25%
NE State Senate 16 Lydia Brasch Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 18 Brett Lindstrom Non-partisan 75%
NE State Senate 19 Jim Scheer Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 20 John McCollister Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 22 Paul Schumacher Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 24 Mark Kolterman Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 26 Matt Hansen Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 28 Patty Pansing Brooks Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 29 Kate Bolz Non-partisan 75%
NE State Senate 30 Roy Baker Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 31 Rick Kolowski Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 32 Laura Ebke Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 34 Curt Friesen Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 36 Matt Williams Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 38 John Kuehn Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 40 Tyson Larson Non-partisan 25%
NE State Senate 42 Michael Groene Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 44 Dan Hughes Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 45 Sue Crawford Non-partisan 25%
NE State Senate 46 Adam Morfeld Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 48 John Stinner, Sr. Non-partisan 0%
NE State Senate 49 John Murante Non-partisan 25%
Dave Bloomfield 100%
Kathy Campbell 100%
Colby Coash 100%
Tanya Cook 100%
Joni Craighead 100%
Al Davis 25%
Nicole Fox 0%
Tommy Garrett 100%
Mike Gloor 0%
Ken Haar 100%
Galen Hadley 100%
Jerry Johnson 25%
Bill Kintner 25%
Beau McCoy 0%
Heath Mello 100%
Ken Schilz 100%
David Schnoor 0%
Les Seiler 25%
Kate Sullivan 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top