Rating Group: Association of Washington Business

2003 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
WA U.S. House-4 Dan Newhouse R 94%
WA U.S. House-5 Cathy McMorris Rodgers R 97%
WA State House-11 Position 1 Zack Hudgins D 29%
WA State House-12 Position 1 Cary Condotta R 88%
WA State House-15 Position 1 Bruce Chandler R 91%
WA State House-19 Position 2 Brian Blake D 57%
WA State House-20 Position 1 Richard DeBolt R 88%
WA State House-20 Position 2 Ed Orcutt R 89%
WA State House-25 Position 2 Joyce McDonald R 84%
WA State House-29 Position 2 Steve Kirby D 39%
WA State House-32 Position 2 Ruth Kagi D 37%
WA State House-34 Position 1 Eileen Cody D 31%
WA State House-37 Position 1 Sharon Tomiko Santos D 40%
WA State House-37 Position 2 Eric Pettigrew D 43%
WA State House-39 Position 1 Dan Kristiansen R 94%
WA State House-40 Position 2 Jeff Morris D 69%
WA State House-41 Position 2 Judy Clibborn D 54%
WA State House-43 Position 2 Frank Chopp D 51%
WA State House-44 Position 1 John Lovick D 49%
WA State Senate-9 Mark Schoesler R 85%
WA State Senate-10 Barbara Bailey R 91%
WA State Senate-15 Jim Honeyford R 95%
WA State Senate-22 Sam Hunt D 31%
WA State Senate-27 Jeannie Darneille D 37%
WA State Senate-29 Steve Conway D 37%
WA State Senate-30 Mark Miloscia R 40%
WA State Senate-32 Maralyn Chase D 29%
WA State Senate-33 Karen Keiser D 28%
WA State Senate-35 Timothy Sheldon D 98%
WA State Senate-38 John McCoy D 37%
WA State Senate-39 Kirk Pearson R 94%
WA State Senate-42 Doug Ericksen R 97%
WA Council Member-1 Dan Roach 77%
WA Council Member-2 Pam Roach 95%
WA Council Member-2 Brian Sullivan 49%
WA Council Member-5 Hans Dunshee D 37%
WA Council Member-5 Dave Upthegrove 32%
WA Council Member-8 Joe McDermott 31%
WA Council Member-At-Large Toby Nixon R 83%
WA Commissioner-1 Jerome Delvin 90%
WA Commissioner-1 Tom Mielke R 86%
WA Commissioner-2 Sandra Romero D 31%
John Ahern 85%
Gary Alexander 91%
Glenn Anderson 94%
Mike Armstrong 94%
Brad Benson 85%
Donald Benton 93%
Jean Berkey 54%
Marc Boldt 94%
Dale Brandland 98%
Lisa Brown 33%
Jim Buck 91%
Roger Bush 83%
Jack Cairnes 89%
Tom Campbell 59%
Don Carlson 93%
Michael Carrell 86%
Jim Clements 89%
Mike Cooper 34%
Don Cox 91%
Larry Crouse 83%
Alex Deccio 97%
Mary Lou Dickerson 31%
Mark Doumit 61%
Jeanne Edwards 32%
William Eickmeyer 53%
Tracey Eide 44%
Luke Esser 95%
Darlene Fairley 26%
Bill Finkbeiner 95%
Dennis Flannigan 40%
Rosa Franklin 29%
Karen Fraser 29%
Bill Fromhold 49%
Jeffrey Gombosky 52%
Bill Grant 54%
Kathy Haigh 43%
Patricia Hale 98%
Shirley Hankins 74%
Jim Hargrove 58%
Brian Hatfield 29%
Mary Haugen 70%
Mike Hewitt 98%
Bill Hinkle 89%
Janéa Holmquist Newbry 86%
James Horn 98%
Ross Hunter 51%
Ken Jacobsen 34%
Fred Jarrett 83%
Stephen Johnson 95%
Jim Kastama 54%
Phyllis Kenney 37%
Lynn Kessler 54%
Adam Kline 25%
Jeanne Kohl-Welles 37%
Patricia Lantz 46%
Kelli Linville 57%
Dave Mastin 88%
Rosemary McAuliffe 37%
Robert McCaslin, Sr. 94%
Jim McIntire 40%
Lois McMahan 89%
Jim Moeller 48%
Dawn Morrell 43%
Bob Morton 98%
Joyce Mulliken 93%
Edward Murray 37%
Al O'Brien 51%
Robert Oke 98%
Linda Parlette 98%
Cheryl Pflug 94%
Erik Poulsen 33%
Margarita Prentice 37%
Skip Priest 83%
Dave Quall 61%
Marilyn Rasmussen 83%
Aaron Reardon 55%
Debbie Regala 27%
Phil Rockefeller 49%
Dino Rossi 100%
Laura Ruderman 51%
Lynn Schindler 85%
Dave Schmidt 98%
Shay Schual-Berke 29%
Barry Sehlin 93%
Jan Shabro 91%
Larry Sheahan 98%
Betti Sheldon 39%
Paull Shin 59%
Geoff Simpson 29%
Mary Skinner 91%
Helen Sommers 39%
Harriet Spanel 29%
Val Stevens 95%
Bob Sump 91%
Dan Swecker 95%
Georganne Talcott 85%
Patricia Thibaudeau 23%
Rodney Tom 89%
Velma Veloria 34%
Deb Wallace 48%
James West 100%
Shirley Winsley 66%
Alex Wood 37%
Beverly Woods 89%
Joseph Zarelli 98%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.