Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Electrical Contractors Association

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Thomas Reynolds 82%
Jay Rockefeller IV 38%
Ciro Rodriguez 24%
Mike Rogers 88%
Mike Ross 47%
Steve Rothman 12%
Jim Ryun 88%
Martin Olav Sabo 12%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 47%
Rick Santorum 58%
Paul Sarbanes 42%
Jim Saxton 71%
Edward Schrock 82%
John Shadegg 88%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 88%
Christopher Shays 88%
Donald Sherwood 88%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 94%
Ike Skelton 59%
Gordon Smith 83%
Nick Smith 94%
Olympia Snowe 75%
Vic Snyder 12%
Mark Souder 82%
Arlen Specter 71%
John Spratt, Jr. 35%
Pete Stark 12%
Cliff Stearns 82%
Charles Stenholm 41%
Ted Stevens 54%
Ted Strickland 24%
Bart Stupak 24%
John Sullivan 100%
John Sununu 88%
John Sweeney 88%
Tom Tancredo 82%
John Tanner 53%
Ellen Tauscher 35%
William Tauzin II 88%
Charles Taylor 76%
Gene Taylor 35%
Lee Terry 88%
Craig Thomas 50%
William Thomas 88%
Todd Tiahrt 88%
John Tierney 12%
Ed Towns 41%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 24%
James Turner 47%
Mark Udall 18%
David Vitter 88%
George Voinovich 67%
James Walsh 88%
Zach Wamp 94%
John Warner 71%
Diane Watson 22%
Mel Watt 18%
Henry Waxman 12%
Anthony Weiner 12%
David Weldon 88%
W. Curtis Weldon 65%
Gerald Weller 88%
Robert Wexler 12%
Ed Whitfield 88%
Heather Wilson 88%
Frank Wolf 94%
Lynn Woolsey 12%
David Wu 12%
Albert Wynn 29%
Bill Young 82%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top