Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Electrical Contractors Association

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Saxby Chambliss 82%
Hillary Clinton 42%
Howard Coble 88%
Michael Collins 88%
Kent Conrad 50%
Jon Corzine 38%
Jerry Costello 47%
Christopher Cox 88%
Larry Craig 62%
Robert Cramer 88%
Philip Crane 82%
Ander Crenshaw 88%
Barbara Cubin 65%
Randall Cunningham 88%
Thomas Daschle 38%
James Davis 24%
Jo Ann Davis 88%
Thomas Davis III 82%
Bill Delahunt 18%
Thomas DeLay 88%
James DeMint 88%
Peter Deutsch 24%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 88%
Norm Dicks 18%
John Dingell 24%
Chris Dodd 38%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 71%
Calvin Dooley 53%
John Doolittle 88%
Byron Dorgan 50%
David Dreier 88%
Jennifer Dunn 88%
John Edwards 54%
Chet Edwards 35%
Vern Ehlers 82%
Jo Ann Emerson 82%
Philip English 82%
John Ensign 50%
Bob Etheridge 35%
Lane Evans 12%
Terry Everett 82%
Sam Farr 18%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 18%
Russ Feingold 50%
Michael Ferguson 76%
Bob Filner 12%
Peter Fitzgerald 79%
Mark Foley 94%
Randy Forbes 78%
Harold Ford, Jr. 41%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 82%
Barney Frank 12%
William Frist 67%
Jonas Frost III 18%
Elton Gallegly 82%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 18%
Jim Gibbons 82%
Wayne Gilchrest 82%
Paul Gillmor 76%
Charlie Gonzalez 6%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 88%
Bart Gordon 76%
Porter Goss 88%
Daniel Graham 42%
Mark Green 88%
James Greenwood 88%
Judd Gregg 58%
Gilbert Gutknecht 88%
Charles Hagel 62%
Ralph Hall 82%
Tom Harkin 46%
Jane Harman 41%
Melissa Hart 88%
J. Dennis Hastert 91%
Doc Hastings 88%
Robert Hayes 88%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 88%
Joel Hefley 71%
Wally Herger, Jr. 88%
Baron Hill 24%
Maurice Hinchey 12%
Rubén Hinojosa, Sr. 35%
David Lee Hobson 88%
Joseph Hoeffel 18%
Pete Hoekstra 88%
Thomas Holden 35%
Ernest Hollings 46%
Rush Holt, Jr. 35%
Mike Honda 18%
Darlene Hooley 41%
John Nathan Hostettler 88%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 71%
Kenny Hulshof 88%
Duncan Hunter 88%
Henry Hyde 82%
Daniel Inouye 33%
Steve Israel 53%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 88%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 12%
William Jefferson 35%
James Merrill Jeffords 71%
William Lewis Jenkins 82%
Christopher John 82%
Nancy Johnson 88%
Tim Johnson 88%
Timothy Johnson 54%
Paul Kanjorski 24%
Richard Keller 88%
Sue Kelly 76%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 38%
Mark Kennedy 88%
Patrick Kennedy 12%
John Kerry 38%
Dale Kildee 24%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 24%
Jack Kingston 88%
Mark Kirk 88%
Gerald Kleczka 12%
Joseph Knollenberg 88%
Herb Kohl 54%
James Kolbe 88%
Dennis Kucinich 12%
Jon Kyl 58%
Ray LaHood 82%
Nicholas Lampson 35%
Mary Landrieu 62%
Tom Lantos 12%
Tom Latham 76%
Steve LaTourette 82%
James Leach 76%
Carl Levin 50%
Jerry Lewis 82%
Ron Lewis 88%
Joe Lieberman 38%
Blanche Lincoln 83%
John Linder 88%
William Lipinski 41%
Trent Lott, Sr. 67%
Ken Lucas 76%
Dick Lugar 71%
Don Manzullo 88%
Jim Matheson 47%
Robert Matsui 12%
Carolyn McCarthy 53%
Karen McCarthy 12%
James McCrery III 88%
Jim McDermott 12%
John McHugh 82%
Mike McIntyre 65%
Buck McKeon 82%
Michael McNulty 12%
Martin Meehan 12%
John Mica 88%
Barbara Mikulski 38%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 12%
Gary Miller 88%
George Miller 12%
Jeff Miller 75%
Zell Bryan Miller 79%
Alan Mollohan 12%
Dennis Moore 29%
Jim Moran, Jr. 24%
Jack Murtha 18%
Sue Myrick 88%
Ben Nelson 79%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 88%
Robert William Ney 88%
Don Nickles 58%
Anne Northup 88%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 82%
James Nussle 88%
Jim Oberstar 12%
Dave Obey 18%
John Olver 18%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 24%
Thomas William Osborne 94%
Doug Ose 88%
Major Owens 18%
Michael Oxley 71%
Ed Pastor 29%
Ron Paul 76%
Donald Payne 18%
John Peterson 88%
Tom Petri 76%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 88%
Joe Pitts 88%
Todd Platts 82%
Richard Pombo 82%
Earl Pomeroy 24%
Deborah Pryce 88%
Adam Putnam 88%
Jack Quinn 71%
George Radanovich 82%
Nick Rahall II 12%
James Ramstad 88%
Charlie Rangel 12%
Ralph Regula 88%
Denny Rehberg 88%
Harry Reid 38%
Silvestre Reyes 18%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top