Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Forest and Paper Association

2005-2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Mark Pryor 71%
Adam Putnam 91%
George Radanovich 100%
Nick Rahall II 41%
James Ramstad 58%
Charlie Rangel 18%
Ralph Regula 100%
Denny Rehberg 91%
Harry Reid 42%
Richard Renzi 100%
Silvestre Reyes 63%
Thomas Reynolds 100%
Jay Rockefeller IV 57%
Mike Rogers 100%
Mike Ross 75%
Steve Rothman 16%
John Salazar 54%
Ken Salazar 57%
Loretta Sanchez 16%
Jim Saxton 50%
Jean Schmidt 100%
Allyson Schwartz 16%
John Shadegg 91%
Christopher Shays 50%
Ike Skelton 75%
Gordon Smith 100%
Olympia Snowe 71%
Vic Snyder 33%
Mark Souder 100%
Arlen Specter 85%
John Spratt, Jr. 16%
Pete Stark 18%
Cliff Stearns 91%
Ted Stevens 100%
Bart Stupak 22%
John Sullivan 100%
John Sununu 66%
Tom Tancredo 83%
John Tanner 83%
Ellen Tauscher 25%
Gene Taylor 66%
Lee Terry 100%
Craig Thomas 85%
Todd Tiahrt 91%
John Tierney 16%
Ed Towns 60%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 16%
Mark Udall 16%
David Vitter 85%
George Voinovich 85%
James Walsh 83%
Zach Wamp 91%
John Warner 100%
Diane Watson 16%
Mel Watt 16%
Henry Waxman 9%
Anthony Weiner 16%
David Weldon 91%
Gerald Weller 100%
Lynn Westmoreland 100%
Robert Wexler 16%
Ed Whitfield 100%
Heather Wilson 100%
Frank Wolf 83%
Lynn Woolsey 16%
David Wu 41%
Albert Wynn 41%
Bill Young 91%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top