Rating Group: Palmetto Family Alliance

2003-2004 Positions (House Only)

State Office Name Party Rating
SC U.S. House-3 Jeff Duncan R 90%
SC State House-1 William Whitmire R 80%
SC State House-2 William Sandifer III R 90%
SC State House-6 Brian White R 90%
SC State House-12 Anne Parks D 40%
SC State House-14 Michael Pitts R 90%
SC State House-19 Dwight Loftis R 100%
SC State House-20 Daniel Hamilton R 80%
SC State House-42 Mike Anthony D 70%
SC State House-43 Greg Delleney, Jr. R 100%
SC State House-46 Gary Simrill R 100%
SC State House-51 J. David Weeks D 60%
SC State House-55 Jackie Hayes D 70%
SC State House-65 James Lucas R 90%
SC State House-66 Gilda Cobb-Hunter D 30%
SC State House-67 Murrell Smith, Jr. R 90%
SC State House-72 James Smith, Jr. D 20%
SC State House-74 Todd Rutherford D 0%
SC State House-76 Leon Howard D 20%
SC State House-80 Jimmy Bales D 80%
SC State House-82 William Clyburn, Sr. D 10%
SC State House-85 Chip Huggins R 90%
SC State House-88 McLain Toole R 70%
SC State House-91 Lonnie Hosey D 30%
SC State House-95 Jerry Govan, Jr. D 30%
SC State House-107 Alan Clemmons R 90%
SC State House-109 David Mack III D 0%
SC State House-113 Seth Whipper D 10%
SC State House-116 Robert Brown D 20%
SC State House-118 Bill Herbkersman R 70%
SC State House-122 Bill Bowers D 50%
SC State Senate-2 Rex Rice R 100%
SC State Senate-7 Karl Allen D 63%
Liston Barfield 90%
James Battle, Jr. 80%
Kenneth Bingham 80%
Lester Branham, Jr. 60%
Grady Brown 50%
Harry Cato 90%
Daniel Cooper 80%
Tracy Edge 80%
Marion Frye 100%
Robert Harrell, Jr. 80%
James Harrison 90%
Douglas Jennings, Jr. 38%
Kenneth Kennedy 20%
Herbert Kirsh 80%
Chip Limehouse III 90%
Lanny Littlejohn 90%
Walton McLeod III 50%
James Merrill 80%
Vida Miller 40%
James Neal 80%
Joseph Neal 20%
Denny Neilson 90%
Harry Ott, Jr. 50%
Phillip Owens 100%
Lewis Pinson 100%
Edward Pitts, Jr. 90%
B. R. Skelton 78%
Donald Smith 80%
Roland Smith 70%
James Stewart, Jr. 70%
Michael Thompson 80%
C. David Umphlett, Jr. 60%
Thad Viers 80%
Annette Young 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.