Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Greenville Tea Party

2011 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
SC Lieutenant Governor Kevin Bryant Republican 93%
SC State House 1 William Whitmire Republican 53%
SC State House 2 William Sandifer III Republican 47%
SC State House 4 Davey Hiott Republican 41%
SC State House 6 Brian White Republican 47%
SC State House 9 Anne Thayer Republican 65%
SC State House 16 Mark Willis Republican 59%
SC State House 18 Tommy Stringer Republican 65%
SC State House 19 Dwight Loftis Republican 47%
SC State House 20 Daniel Hamilton Republican 76%
SC State House 21 Phyllis Henderson Republican 82%
SC State House 24 Bruce Bannister Republican 47%
SC State House 27 Garry Smith Republican 86%
SC State House 28 Eric Bedingfield Republican 69%
SC State House 33 Eddie Tallon, Sr. Republican 41%
SC State House 34 Mike Forrester Republican 53%
SC State House 35 Bill Chumley Republican 71%
SC State House 36 Rita Allison Republican 47%
SC State Senate 1 Thomas Alexander Republican 38%
SC State Senate 4 Mike Gambrell Republican 41%
SC State Senate 5 Tom Corbin Republican 81%
SC State Senate 9 Danny Verdin III Republican 67%
SC State Senate 13 Shane Martin Republican 85%
SC State Senate 14 Harvey Peeler, Jr. Republican 69%
Eric Bikas 47%
Don Bowen 47%
Doug Brannon 50%
Lee Bright III 100%
D.W. Cole 47%
Michael Fair 50%
Larry Martin 38%
Wendy Nanney 63%
William O'Dell 44%
Phillip Owens 59%
Steve Parker 56%
Phillip Shoopman 85%
B. R. Skelton 53%
David Thomas 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top