Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Resource Development Council for Alaska

2010 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
AK State House 1 Scott Kawasaki Democratic 0%
AK State House 3 Tammie Wilson Republican 50%
AK State House 4 David Guttenberg Democratic 0%
AK State House 8 Mark Neuman Republican 67%
AK State House 20 Les Gara Democratic 0%
AK State House 23 Chris Tuck Democratic 25%
AK State House 25 Charisse Millett Republican 58%
AK State House 29 Mike Chenault Republican 67%
AK State House 31 Paul Seaton Republican 0%
AK State House 37 Bryce Edgmon Democratic 25%
AK State House 39 Neal Foster Democratic 42%
AK State Senate B John Coghill, Jr. Republican 33%
AK State Senate G Anna MacKinnon Republican 58%
AK State Senate H Bill Wielechowski Democratic 0%
AK State Senate I Berta Gardner Democratic 8%
AK State Senate M Kevin Meyer Republican 50%
AK State Senate P Gary Stevens Republican 33%
AK State Senate Q Dennis Egan Democratic 50%
AK State Senate R Bert Stedman Republican 25%
AK State Senate S Lyman Hoffman Democratic 17%
AK State Senate T Donald Olson Democratic 25%
AK Mayor At-Large Reggie Joule 25%
Alan Austerman 33%
Bob Buch 25%
Con Bunde 83%
Sharon Cissna 0%
Harry Crawford, Jr. 8%
Nancy Dahlstrom 25%
Bettye Davis 25%
Mike Doogan 25%
Fred Dyson 42%
Johnny Ellis 17%
Hollis French II 0%
Carl Gatto 42%
Max Gruenberg, Jr. 33%
John Harris 33%
Mike Hawker 58%
Bob Herron 42%
Lindsey Holmes 25%
Charlie Huggins 75%
Kyle Johansen 50%
Craig Johnson 92%
Wes Keller 42%
Mike Kelly 50%
Beth Kerttula 0%
Albert Kookesh 17%
Bob Lynn 25%
Lesil McGuire 58%
Linda Menard 42%
Cathy Muñoz 42%
Kurt Olson 50%
Joe Paskvan 42%
Pete Petersen 25%
Jay Ramras 67%
Woodie Salmon 0%
Bill Stoltze 42%
Joe Thomas 42%
Bill Thomas, Jr. 33%
Thomas Wagoner 42%
Peggy Wilson 58%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top