Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: North Carolina Association of Educators

1997 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
NC U.S. House 5 Virginia Foxx Republican 82%
NC U.S. House 12 Alma Adams Democratic 100%
NC Governor Roy Cooper III Democratic 82%
NC State House 31 Mickey Michaux, Jr. Democratic 100%
NC State House 56 Verla Insko Democratic 94%
NC State House 79 Julia Howard Republican 44%
NC State House 101 Beverly Earle Democratic 94%
NC State Senate 14 Dan Blue, Jr. Democratic 100%
Charles Albertson 82%
Martha Alexander 82%
Austin Allran 90%
Cary Allred 29%
Gene Gray Arnold 61%
Philip Augustine Baddour, Jr. 89%
Rex Baker 56%
Frank Ballance, Jr. 90%
Patrick Ballantine 73%
Bobby Harold Barbee, Sr. 41%
Marc Basnight 90%
Cherie Berry 50%
James Black 100%
Donald Allen Bonner 100%
Joanne Bowie 61%
Flossie Boyd-McIntyre 100%
Jerry Braswell 94%
John Walter Brown 41%
Harold Brubaker 22%
Charles Franklin Buchanan 50%
Lanier Cansler 44%
J. Russell Capps 28%
James Calvin Carpenter 64%
Robert Carpenter 73%
John Carrington 80%
Walter Church, Sr. 73%
Debbie Clary 56%
Betsy Cochrane 70%
Nelson Cole 89%
James Crawford, Jr. 75%
Billy James Creech 56%
Arlie Franklin Culp, Jr. 41%
William Thomas Culpepper III 100%
William Pete Cunningham 100%
Walter Dalton 73%
Charlie Dannelly 64%
Leo Daughtry 50%
Donald Spencer Davis 44%
Michael Decker, Sr. 39%
Andrew Thomas Dedmon 94%
Jerry Dockham 61%
Don East 73%
Ruth Easterling 86%
Rick Louis Eddins 44%
James Samuel Ellis 41%
Theresa Harlow Esposito 50%
Milton Fitch, Jr. 94%
James Forrester 82%
Stanley Harold Fox 67%
Charlotte Ancher Gardner 46%
John Garwood 80%
Wayne Goodwin 100%
William Grady 72%
Lyons Gray 56%
Jim Gulley 44%
Wilbur Gulley 100%
Joe Hackney 100%
Thomas Hardaway 94%
Fletcher Hartsell, Jr. 90%
Robert Jonathan Hensley, Jr. 94%
William Seth Hiatt 44%
Dewey Hill 83%
George Milton Holmes 50%
Hamilton Horton, Jr. 55%
David Hoyle, Sr. 82%
Howard Hunter, Jr. 100%
John Hurley 69%
Mary Jarrell 100%
Margaret Jeffus 100%
Luther Henry Jordan, Jr. 88%
Larry Thomas Justus 50%
John Kerr III 78%
Eleanor Kinnaird 90%
Joe Kiser 50%
Howard Nathaniel Lee 90%
Jeanne Hopkins Lucas 82%
Paul Luebke 94%
Robert Martin 78%
William Martin 90%
Mary McAllister 88%
Daniel McComas 53%
Willard Eugene McCombs 56%
Paul Reeves McCrary 94%
William Edwin McMahan 63%
George Miller, Jr. 94%
Brad Miller 91%
David Morris Miner 61%
William Franklin Mitchell 56%
Richard Lee Moore 83%
Richard Morgan 47%
Amelia Morris 39%
Martin Nesbitt, Jr. 100%
Edd Nye 83%
Thomas LaFontine Odom, Sr. 80%
Warren Claude Oldham 94%
William Owens, Jr. 78%
Bev Perdue 82%
Jim Phillips, Sr. 82%
Aaron Plyler 80%
Jean Preston 61%
Liston Bryan Ramsey 100%
Anthony Rand 82%
John Melvin Rayfield 50%
David Redwine 100%
Eric Miller Reeves 91%
Richard Eugene Rogers 80%
Robert Rucho 82%
Carolyn Barnes Russell 59%
Drew Saunders 94%
Paul Wayne Sexton, Sr. 50%
Larry Shaw 89%
Robert Shaw 80%
Wilma Sherrill 65%
Ronald Smith 88%
Robert Soles, Jr. 82%
Edgar Starnes 31%
Ronnie Sutton 100%
Timothy Tallent 50%
Gregory James Thompson 53%
Joe Tolson 88%
William Wainwright 100%
Edward 'Alexander Warner, Jr. 100%
Edward Warren 78%
Nurham Osbie Warwick 100%
Hugh Webster 55%
David Weinstein 82%
Allen Wellons 82%
Constance Wilson 25%
William Eugene Wilson 47%
Larry Womble 94%
Thomas Wright 100%
Douglas Yongue 94%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top