Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: North Carolina Association of Educators

1998 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
NC U.S. House 5 Virginia Foxx Republican 86%
NC U.S. House 12 Alma Adams Democratic 100%
NC Governor Roy Cooper III Democratic 88%
NC State House 31 Mickey Michaux, Jr. Democratic 100%
NC State House 56 Verla Insko Democratic 100%
NC State House 79 Julia Howard Republican 53%
NC State House 101 Beverly Earle Democratic 85%
NC State Senate 14 Dan Blue, Jr. Democratic 83%
Charles Albertson 86%
Martha Alexander 93%
Gordon Philip Allen 87%
Austin Allran 86%
Cary Allred 57%
Gene Gray Arnold 43%
Philip Augustine Baddour, Jr. 100%
Rex Baker 47%
Frank Ballance, Jr. 88%
Patrick Ballantine 88%
Bobby Harold Barbee, Sr. 46%
Daniel Barefoot 75%
Marc Basnight 100%
Cherie Berry 62%
James Black 93%
Donald Allen Bonner 100%
Joanne Bowie 64%
Flossie Boyd-McIntyre 100%
Jerry Braswell 100%
John Walter Brown 50%
Harold Brubaker 54%
Charles Franklin Buchanan 67%
Lanier Cansler 53%
J. Russell Capps 50%
James Calvin Carpenter 53%
Robert Carpenter 88%
John Carrington 100%
Walter Church, Sr. 67%
Debbie Clary 46%
Betsy Cochrane 75%
Nelson Cole 93%
James Crawford, Jr. 60%
Billy James Creech 47%
Arlie Franklin Culp, Jr. 53%
William Thomas Culpepper III 100%
William Pete Cunningham 93%
Walter Dalton 88%
Charlie Dannelly 88%
Leo Daughtry 43%
Donald Spencer Davis 53%
Michael Decker, Sr. 60%
Andrew Thomas Dedmon 100%
Jerry Dockham 50%
Don East 100%
Ruth Easterling 92%
Rick Louis Eddins 53%
James Samuel Ellis 53%
Theresa Harlow Esposito 38%
Milton Fitch, Jr. 100%
James Forrester 88%
Stanley Harold Fox 100%
Charlotte Ancher Gardner 53%
John Garwood 86%
Wayne Goodwin 100%
William Grady 64%
Lyons Gray 50%
Jim Gulley 53%
Wilbur Gulley 100%
Joe Hackney 100%
Thomas Hardaway 100%
Fletcher Hartsell, Jr. 83%
Robert Jonathan Hensley, Jr. 100%
William Seth Hiatt 67%
Dewey Hill 86%
George Milton Holmes 43%
Hamilton Horton, Jr. 86%
David Hoyle, Sr. 86%
Howard Hunter, Jr. 100%
John Hurley 93%
Mary Jarrell 100%
Margaret Jeffus 100%
Luther Henry Jordan, Jr. 86%
Larry Thomas Justus 46%
John Kerr III 100%
Eleanor Kinnaird 88%
Joe Kiser 30%
Howard Nathaniel Lee 88%
Jeanne Hopkins Lucas 86%
Paul Luebke 100%
Robert Martin 88%
William Martin 88%
Mary McAllister 90%
Daniel McComas 60%
Willard Eugene McCombs 60%
Paul Reeves McCrary 100%
William Edwin McMahan 43%
George Miller, Jr. 100%
Brad Miller 88%
David Morris Miner 42%
William Franklin Mitchell 53%
Kenneth Moore 86%
Richard Lee Moore 100%
Richard Morgan 47%
Amelia Morris 50%
Martin Nesbitt, Jr. 93%
Edd Nye 100%
Thomas LaFontine Odom, Sr. 83%
Warren Claude Oldham 93%
William Owens, Jr. 80%
Bev Perdue 88%
Jim Phillips, Sr. 86%
Aaron Plyler 88%
Jean Preston 69%
William Purcell 88%
Liston Bryan Ramsey 100%
Anthony Rand 88%
John Melvin Rayfield 53%
David Redwine 100%
Eric Miller Reeves 86%
Richard Eugene Rogers 100%
Robert Rucho 50%
Carolyn Barnes Russell 64%
Drew Saunders 100%
Paul Wayne Sexton, Sr. 67%
Larry Shaw 86%
Robert Shaw 88%
Wilma Sherrill 69%
Ronald Smith 100%
Robert Soles, Jr. 83%
Edgar Starnes 42%
Ronnie Sutton 100%
Timothy Tallent 25%
Gregory James Thompson 64%
Joe Tolson 93%
William Wainwright 100%
Edward 'Alexander Warner, Jr. 92%
Edward Warren 88%
Nurham Osbie Warwick 92%
Hugh Webster 63%
David Weinstein 88%
Allen Wellons 88%
Constance Wilson 27%
William Eugene Wilson 67%
Larry Womble 100%
Thomas Wright 83%
Douglas Yongue 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top