Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Nebraska League of Conservation Voters

2016 Positions (Lifetime)

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
NE State Senate 4 Bob Hilkemann Non-partisan 88%
NE State Senate 9 Sara Howard Non-partisan 85%
NE State Senate 11 Ernie Chambers Non-partisan 91%
NE State Senate 18 Brett Lindstrom Non-partisan 73%
NE State Senate 19 Jim Scheer Non-partisan 81%
NE State Senate 20 John McCollister Non-partisan 96%
NE State Senate 24 Mark Kolterman Non-partisan 59%
NE State Senate 26 Matt Hansen Non-partisan 94%
NE State Senate 28 Patty Pansing Brooks Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 29 Kate Bolz Non-partisan 91%
NE State Senate 31 Rick Kolowski Non-partisan 86%
NE State Senate 34 Curt Friesen Non-partisan 55%
NE State Senate 36 Matt Williams Non-partisan 91%
NE State Senate 42 Mike Groene Non-partisan 35%
NE State Senate 44 Dan Hughes Non-partisan 51%
NE State Senate 45 Sue Crawford Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 46 Adam Morfeld Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 48 John Stinner, Sr. Non-partisan 100%
NE Treasurer John Murante Republican 66%
Roy Baker 71%
Dave Bloomfield 35%
Lydia Brasch 72%
Kathy Campbell 96%
Colby Coash 82%
Tanya Cook 87%
Joni Craighead 68%
Al Davis 85%
Laura Ebke 59%
Nicole Fox 86%
Tommy Garrett 76%
Mike Gloor 100%
Ken Haar 100%
Galen Hadley 100%
Burke Harr 86%
Jerry Johnson 66%
Bill Kintner 39%
Bob Krist 83%
John Kuehn 56%
Tyson Larson 61%
Beau McCoy 49%
Heath Mello 100%
Merv Riepe 70%
Ken Schilz 82%
David Schnoor 48%
Paul Schumacher 72%
Les Seiler 81%
Jim Smith 79%
Kate Sullivan 74%
Dan Watermeier 73%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top