Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Nebraska League of Conservation Voters

2016 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
NE State Senate 4 Bob Hilkemann Non-partisan 86%
NE State Senate 9 Sara Howard Non-partisan 88%
NE State Senate 11 Ernie Chambers Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 18 Brett Lindstrom Non-partisan 67%
NE State Senate 19 Jim Scheer Non-partisan 71%
NE State Senate 20 John McCollister Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 24 Mark Kolterman Non-partisan 44%
NE State Senate 26 Matt Hansen Non-partisan 89%
NE State Senate 28 Patty Pansing Brooks Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 29 Kate Bolz Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 31 Rick Kolowski Non-partisan 83%
NE State Senate 34 Curt Friesen Non-partisan 50%
NE State Senate 36 Matt Williams Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 42 Mike Groene Non-partisan 25%
NE State Senate 44 Dan Hughes Non-partisan 50%
NE State Senate 45 Sue Crawford Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 46 Adam Morfeld Non-partisan 100%
NE State Senate 48 John Stinner, Sr. Non-partisan 100%
NE Treasurer John Murante Republican 78%
Roy Baker 43%
Dave Bloomfield 29%
Lydia Brasch 75%
Kathy Campbell 100%
Colby Coash 90%
Tanya Cook 100%
Joni Craighead 100%
Al Davis 89%
Laura Ebke 63%
Nicole Fox 86%
Tommy Garrett 88%
Mike Gloor 100%
Ken Haar 100%
Galen Hadley 100%
Burke Harr 71%
Jerry Johnson 45%
Bill Kintner 43%
Bob Krist 75%
John Kuehn 57%
Tyson Larson 78%
Beau McCoy 63%
Heath Mello 100%
Merv Riepe 75%
Ken Schilz 83%
David Schnoor 55%
Paul Schumacher 71%
Les Seiler 63%
Jim Smith 75%
Kate Sullivan 57%
Dan Watermeier 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top