Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Arizona National Federation of Independent Business

1996 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Carolyn Allen 100%
Mark Anderson 100%
Ernest Baird 100%
Stan Barnes 100%
R. Fulton Brock 100%
Robert Burns 100%
Larry Chesley 100%
Pat Conner 100%
Lori Daniels 100%
David Eberhart 100%
AZ State Senate 16 David Farnsworth Republican 100%
Michael Gardner 100%
Randall Gnant 100%
John Greene 100%
Jeff Groscost 100%
A.V. Hardt 100%
Joe Hart 100%
Mark Killian 100%
Wesley Marsh 100%
W. A. McGibbon 100%
Paul Mortensen 100%
Thomas Patterson 100%
David Petersen 100%
Gary Richardson 100%
Robin Shaw 100%
Tom Smith 100%
Carol Springer 100%
Jim Weiers 100%
Donald Aldridge 92%
AZ State House 25 Rusty Bowers Republican 92%
Scott Bundgaard 92%
Brenda Burns 92%
Jim Buster 92%
John Huppenthal 92%
Laura Knaperek 92%
Jean McGrath 92%
Warren Austin Turner 92%
Barry Wong 92%
Jerry Overton 91%
Ned King 86%
Robert Blendu 83%
Jan Brewer 83%
Marilyn Jarrett 83%
John Kaites 83%
Lou-Ann Preble 83%
Dan Schottel 83%
Marc Spitzer 83%
Gus Arzberger 75%
Robert Updike 75%
James Henderson, Jr. 70%
Sue Lynch 67%
Patricia Noland 67%
Susan Gerard 64%
Winifred Hershberger 64%
Keith Bee 58%
Ann Day 58%
Ruben Ortega 58%
John Verkamp 58%
Sue Grace 55%
Becky Jordan 50%
Ruth Solomon 50%
John Wettaw 50%
Jack Brown 42%
Chris Cummiskey 42%
George Cunningham 42%
Ken Cheuvront 36%
Carmen Cajero 33%
Robert Chastain 33%
Herschella Horton 33%
Joe Eddie Lopez 33%
Marion Pickens 33%
Andy Nichols 27%
Elaine Richardson 25%
David Armstead 20%
Paul Newman 18%
Jorge Garcia 16%
Harry Clark 11%
Jack Jackson, Sr. 10%
Linda Aguirre 9%
Kathi Foster 8%
Art Hamilton 8%
Mary Hartley 8%
Phillip Hubbard 8%
Robert McLendon 8%
Manuel Pena Jr. 8%
AZ State House 27 Rebecca Rios Democratic 8%
Victor Soltero 8%
Peter Goudinoff 0%
Benjamin Hanley 0%
Sandra Kennedy 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top