Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Arizona National Federation of Independent Business

1999-2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
AZ State House 3 Sally Ann Gonzales Democratic 9%
AZ State House 25 Rusty Bowers Republican 100%
AZ State House 27 Rebecca Rios Democratic 9%
AZ State Senate 14 Gail Griffin Republican 80%
AZ Supervisor 1 Peter Rios Democratic 40%
Linda Aguirre 50%
Carolyn Allen 44%
Mark Anderson 70%
Gus Arzberger 67%
Carlos Avelar II 27%
Keith Bee 83%
Ken Bennett 100%
Linda Binder 50%
Barbara Blewster 82%
Debra Brimhall 73%
William Brotherton 36%
Jack Brown 50%
Scott Bundgaard 83%
Brenda Burns 83%
Robert Burns 91%
Carmine Cardamone 20%
Ted Carpenter 55%
James Carruthers 45%
Ken Cheuvront 60%
Edward Cirillo 83%
Harry Clark 10%
Dean Cooley 82%
Chris Cummiskey 50%
George Cunningham 50%
Lori Daniels 100%
Ann Day 50%
Kathleen Dunbar 73%
Franklin Flake 100%
Kathi Foster 9%
Tom Freestone 67%
Michael Gardner 89%
Wayne Gardner 64%
Susan Gerard 40%
Lowell Gleason 73%
Randall Gnant 50%
Thomas Gordon 75%
Sue Grace 83%
Linda Gray 73%
Jeff Groscost 73%
Herb Guenther 50%
Darden Hamilton 100%
Joe Hart 82%
Mary Hartley 17%
Jeff Hatch-Miller 80%
Tom Horne 73%
Herschella Horton 20%
Steve Huffman 50%
John Huppenthal 100%
Marilyn Jarrett 82%
Karen Johnson 73%
Laura Knaperek 80%
Leah Landrum Taylor 20%
Sylvia Laughter 27%
Barbara Leff 82%
Joe Eddie Lopez 17%
John Loredo 18%
Mark Maiorana 40%
Wesley Marsh 82%
Steve May 78%
W. A. McGibbon 82%
Jean McGrath 91%
Robert McLendon 9%
Harry Mitchell 50%
Andy Nichols 40%
Debora Norris 30%
Jerry Overton 73%
David Petersen 67%
Marion Pickens 27%
Lou-Ann Preble 73%
Elaine Richardson 50%
Dan Schottel 70%
Tom Smith 67%
Ruth Solomon 67%
Victor Soltero 50%
Marc Spitzer 100%
Ramon Valadez 10%
John Verkamp 27%
Roberta Voss 91%
Christine Weason 43%
Jim Weiers 73%
John Wettaw 50%
Barry Wong 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top